Hydrogen Atom Ground State Wavefunction Normalisation Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter White Ink
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normalisation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of the wavefunction for a hydrogen atom in its ground state, specifically the expression for the wavefunction given as Ψ(r) = C/√(4π)e^(-r/a₀). Participants are exploring the mathematical process required to normalize this wavefunction.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant attempts to calculate the normalization constant C and presents their result. Others question the correctness of this calculation and suggest revisiting the integration process, particularly emphasizing the need to consider the three-dimensional nature of the wavefunction.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the normalization process, with participants providing guidance on the correct integration method and discussing the implications of using spherical coordinates. Some participants acknowledge previous misunderstandings and express gratitude for the clarifications provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants are reminded to consider the appropriate volume differential in spherical coordinates and the implications of integrating over three dimensions, which introduces additional factors in the normalization integral.

White Ink
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A hydrogen atom in the ground state can be described by the following wavefunction:

[tex]\Psi(r) = \frac{C}{\sqrt{4\pi}}e^{- \frac{r}{a_{0}}}[/tex]

Normalise this wavefunction.

The Attempt at a Solution



I did this and got:

[tex]C = \sqrt{\frac{8\pi}{a_{0}}}[/tex]

I have no way of checking this, so I was wondering if anybody could tell me whether I am right or wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite, I don't think. Can you show us how you got that?
 
[tex]\int^{\infty}_{0}\left|\Psi(r)\right|^{2}dr = 1[/tex][tex]\frac{C^{2}}{4\pi}\int^{\infty}_{0}e^{\frac{-2r}{a_{0}}}dr = 1[/tex][tex]u = \frac{2r}{a_{0}}[/tex]

[tex]du = \frac{2}{a_{0}}dr[/tex]

[tex]dr = \frac{a_{0}}{2}du[/tex][tex]\frac{C^{2}}{4\pi}\frac{a_{0}}{2}\int^{\infty}_{0}e^{-u}du = 1[/tex]

Using:

[tex]\int^{\infty}_{0}x^{n}e^{-x}dx = n![/tex]

[tex]\int^{\infty}_{0}e^{-u}du = 0! = 1[/tex]

Thus:

[tex]\frac{C^{2}}{4\pi}\frac{a_{0}}{2} = 1[/tex]

[tex]C^{2} = \frac{8\pi}{a_{0}}[/tex]
 
Think again about the first integral. Even if the wavefunction is only dependent on r, you are still integrating over three-dimensional space. Use the appropriate volume differential for this case (spherical coordinates).

You will notice the equation will reduce to an integral in just r, but it'll have a key difference with the one you're using right now.
 
Proggle said:
Think again about the first integral. Even if the wavefunction is only dependent on r, you are still integrating over three-dimensional space. Use the appropriate volume differential for this case (spherical coordinates).

You will notice the equation will reduce to an integral in just r, but it'll have a key difference with the one you're using right now.

I know exactly what you mean (integrating in the [tex]\theta[/tex] & [tex]\phi[/tex] directions becomes equivalent to multiplying to constant in front of the integration with respect to r by [tex]2\pi^{2}[/tex], since the wavefunction is independent of those two variables). I read over the question too quickly. Thank you for your help.
 
White Ink said:
I know exactly what you mean (integrating in the [tex]\theta[/tex] & [tex]\phi[/tex] directions becomes equivalent to multiplying to constant in front of the integration with respect to r by [tex]2\pi^{2}[/tex], since the wavefunction is independent of those two variables). I read over the question too quickly. Thank you for your help.

In addition there will be an extra factor of r^2 in the integrand, right?
 
Dick said:
In addition there will be an extra factor of r^2 in the integrand, right?

Now that one beats me. I can't see where an additional [tex]r^{2}[/tex] would come from.
 
dV in spherical coordinates is r^2*sin(theta)*dr*dtheta*dphi. Better look that up to make sure my use of angle names agrees with yours. And you won't get a pi^2 from the integration, do it carefully.
 
Ooops, I feel stupid now. I forgot about the metric coefficients and took my volume element to be [tex]dr[/tex][tex]d\theta[/tex] . At least I won't be making that mistake again. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
3K