Hydrogen water, any good?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential health benefits of drinking hydrogen-rich water, particularly for individuals over 30. Participants explore various studies, including a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis, while expressing skepticism about the claims made regarding its antioxidant properties and overall efficacy.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a study claiming health benefits of hydrogen water for people over 30, noting its randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design.
  • Concerns are raised about the small sample size of the study, particularly the limited number of participants over 30 who showed statistically significant results.
  • Participants discuss the antioxidant properties of hydrogen and its potential to reduce oxidative damage, but express skepticism about the validity of these claims.
  • A meta-analysis is cited, emphasizing the need for larger, well-designed studies to substantiate the benefits of hydrogen-rich water.
  • Some participants argue that preliminary results are not sufficient and caution against potential health scams related to hydrogen water.
  • There is a discussion about the credibility of the journals publishing the studies, with one participant pointing out that "Scientific Reports" has a lighter peer review process compared to "Nature."
  • Participants mention the lack of clinically relevant differences between hydrogen water and plain water in observed metrics.
  • One participant humorously suggests that hydrogen water could have the unintended effect of making flatulence less audible.
  • Another participant discusses the chemical properties of hydrogen in water, questioning its acidity compared to carbonated water.
  • Claims are made about hydrogen's non-cytotoxicity and its use in deep diving gas mixtures to prevent decompression sickness.
  • A humorous mention of weight loss is made, though it is unclear how this relates to the hydrogen water discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the efficacy of hydrogen water. While some acknowledge the existence of studies that suggest potential benefits, others remain skeptical about the claims and the quality of the research. The discussion reflects a mix of viewpoints, with ongoing debate about the validity of the claims made regarding hydrogen-rich water.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the small sample sizes in the studies discussed, the need for more rigorous methodologies, and the potential biases in the publication process of the cited research. Participants express uncertainty about the mechanisms behind the proposed benefits of hydrogen water.

Arjan82
Messages
624
Reaction score
619
TL;DR
There is a medical hype telling you to drink water with dissolved H2 in it for health benefits. And there is a study in Nature that actually seems legit (to the layman's eye). So what to make of this?
Here is a study that claims that drinking water with dissolved H2 is a good thing for people over 30:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-68930-2

It is apparently a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial, which sounds good. The total amount of people in the age group >30, the group for which a statistically significant result has been found, is 18 (the results for the <30 group (20 people) did not show a significant benefit).

Apparently the benefit is that H2 is an antioxidant which supposedly has all kind of benefits since, apparently, oxidation of cells/DNA/RNA causes damage leading to higher inflammation levels and other bad stuff.

I have no medical background at all. It seems to me somewhat farfetched that drinking hydrogen water would be really beneficial, and it sounds much more like one of the many medical hypes that go around off of which people try to make lots of money.

So what am I to make of this? Is there some truth in this after all? What do you think?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rabrante
Biology news on Phys.org
Arjan82 said:
TL;DR Summary: There is a medical hype telling you to drink water with dissolved H2 in it for health benefits. And there is a study in Nature that actually seems legit (to the layman's eye). So what to make of this?

Here is a study that claims that drinking water with dissolved H2 is a good thing for people over 30:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-68930-2

It is apparently a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial, which sounds good. The total amount of people in the age group >30, the group for which a statistically significant result has been found, is 18 (the results for the <30 group (20 people) did not show a significant benefit).

Apparently the benefit is that H2 is an antioxidant which supposedly has all kind of benefits since, apparently, oxidation of cells/DNA/RNA causes damage leading to higher inflammation levels and other bad stuff.

I have no medical background at all. It seems to me somewhat farfetched that drinking hydrogen water would be really beneficial, and it sounds much more like one of the many medical hypes that go around off of which people try to make lots of money.

So what am I to make of this? Is there some truth in this after all? What do you think?
Looks positive but not many quality publications on it.

I found this (meta analysis) which is more recent.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10816294/

From the conclusion.

"....These potential (positive health) consequences have aroused debate in the scientific and medical industries. Even though there is great potential in understanding the benefits of hydrogen-rich water, we still have to overcome the existing limitations. We need well-designed studies in humans, with large sample sizes and long-term trials, to ascertain the benefits."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, Tom.G, Klystron and 2 others
Statistical differences in observed metrics of "hydrogen water" consumption vs that of an undescribed/unanalyzed "plain water" were not offered or observed as clinically relevant.
 
"Although preliminary results in clinical trials and studies are encouraging, further research with larger sample sizes and rigorous methodologies is needed to substantiate these findings. Current research needs to fully explain the mechanisms behind the potential benefits of hydrogen-rich water."

Above from the Abstract in the cited article:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10816294/

In my opinion it is a case of "Buyer Beware." At least you will be burping a lot!
(Unless they are talking about converting the H2O to H2O2, in which case you will be spending a lot of time in the hospital. :frown:)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Ok, tnx. So it is certainly not settled then. The meta analysis was very interesting.
 
Well, at least you can light your burps and amaze people. Just don't breathe in when you do it! :-D

Seriously, though, it amazes me how scams persist because people are desperate to believe in things. The public seems to not realize that the number of self-consistent bogus hypotheses that one can propose are ENDLESS.

Here, we have this hydrogen water idea in which someone made a RIDICULOUSLY SIMPLE mental model of a helpful beverage interacting with body. In that model, they had only two things. A single class of oxidant and hydrogen molecules dissolved in water. They assume you DO want to get rid of that oxidant, even though it might be at current equilibrium levels FOR GOOD REASON. They assume the hydrogen has no negative impacts on other things, either.

They assume the benefit is worth the effort. They assume the plastic bottle it comes in won't have negative effects. And after this crap hypothesis is proposed, no reliable testing is done. And you can bet the lack of testing is not due to ethics. It's just that why would a marketing campaign for a profit-driven company want to expose if a product works.

And why would people desperate for ideas want to have the skepticism to demand, "Show me don't tell me." Rush had it right in their lyrics of their straightforward song. If the hypothesis had robust results backing it up from the start, you would know. Why do people even waste time on these days. You're asking them to show you and doing the hunting. Don't waste your time. Ignore things that don't come with proof, unless you find the ideas themselves entertaining.

I might sound pushy, but look around. It's the only way you won't waste time on the endless self-consistent ideas that people seem to think have a good chance of being true because they are not self-contradictory. Look at the scope of the idea - does it have solid studies backing it up or at least lots of real world complexity that stands up to scrutiny? If not, I assure you with 99.9% certainty, it is bogus.

Just ask people who invent drugs. You pretty much never find a good idea that is simple. Ever. It should be tested before even entering public conversation. Thanks. I hope you're not pushed away by my "IM-maybe-not-so-HO".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would agree with you if the only thing was that some company sold H2 water with some consistent sounding but unverifiable claim. My point here is that this particular idea does come with some backing / proof, look at the papers cited in this thread, even one in Nature... So it was indeed tested, it does have solid looking studies. My question was on how to interpret this, what is this study worth?
 
That's not "Nature" the respected, prestigious, rigorously peer reviewed, and extremely difficult to get published in scientific journal, it's "Scientific Reports" (same publisher: Springer-Nature). Scientific Reports is an open access journal and publishes anything on any topic that passes a much lighter peer review and where authors pay publication costs
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexB23, Cepacia and Arjan82
The speed of sound in hydrogen is significantly higher than in helium. One advantage of taking hydrogenated water could be that breaking-wind becomes inaudible to others (although it might attract nearby dogs).
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Arjan82
  • #10
So, when CO2 is added to water, the water becomes more acidic, meaning more H+ ions.
But, H2 added to water does not make it more acidic??? forming H+ ions.
Kinda makes sense as the disassociated H2 molecule would have to each H+ ion acting as an acid-base congugate pair with the other.

The meta study by Pub Med talks about molecular hydrogen, ie H2. in water has effects within cells
2.2. Impact of Hydrogen-Rich Water on Oxidative StressHydrogen reduces the oxidative damage that occurs between biological molecules and hydroxyl radicals [1]. With this reduction in oxidized macromolecules, there is a decrease in cellular and mitochondrial injuries

One concrete advantage I see listed is
Another added advantage is that, even at higher concentrations, hydrogen has no cytotoxicity [4]. Also, in mixed deep diving gas, hydrogen gas in high concentrations is used for inhalation to prevent arterial gas thrombi and to prevent decompression sickness
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arjan82
  • #11
And a bonus effect of weight loss! (Not mass loss, just added buoyancy)
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Arjan82
  • #12

Hydrogen Water: Extra Healthy or a Hoax?—A Systematic Review​

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10816294/

Increased interest and continuous study are being directed toward the possible health advantages of hydrogen-rich water in a variety of areas, including physical endurance, exercise capacity, cardiovascular disease, liver function, COVID-19, mental health, anti-aging research, and oxidative stress. These potential consequences have aroused debate in the scientific and medical industries. Even though there is great potential in understanding the benefits of hydrogen-rich water, we still have to overcome the existing limitations. We need well-designed studies in humans, with large sample sizes and long-term trials, to ascertain the benefits.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arjan82
  • #13
The problem is all major brands of H2 water test positive for potentially deadly dihydrogen monoxide contamination
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Cepacia, BillTre and 256bits
  • #14
BWV said:
The problem is all major brands of H2 water test positive for potentially deadly dihydrogen monoxide contamination
Indeed. I inhaled a small amount of it once. Almost died.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Cepacia, BillTre and BWV

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K