Hydrostatics and Cylindrical Tank

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the force exerted by water on the bottom of a cylindrical tank filled to the brim. The tank has specific dimensions, and the focus is on the force exerted by the bottom 1 ft band of water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether to integrate from the top or bottom of the water column and how to account for the weight of the water above the bottom 1 ft band. There are differing expressions proposed for calculating the force, leading to confusion over their validity and units.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the integration setup are being explored, with participants questioning the appropriateness of including the weight of the water above the bottom band. Some guidance has been offered regarding the pressure contributions from the water column, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the pressure from the water above the bottom 1 ft band should be considered, even if it is not in direct contact. There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of this on the calculations.

Shoelace Thm.
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I fill a cylindrical tank of length 50 ft and diameter 90 ft with water (to the brim). What is the force the bottom 1 ft band of water exerts on the lining?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My main doubt is whether i should integrate from 0 to 1 and add the weight of the water above or simply integrate from 49 to 50 and be done. Both yield significantly different results.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what variable you integrating with respect to. Is it distance from the top or distance from the bottom? Show your setup.
 
I have one representation being [itex]\vec{F} = 62.4 * 2 * \pi*45 \int^1_0 x\,dx + \pi*45^2*49[/itex], where dx is a differential movement from the top of the 1 ft band to the base of the tank, and the other being [itex]\vec{F} = 62.4 * 2 * \pi*45 \int^{50}_{49} x\,dx[/itex], where dx represents the same. Both expressions take into account the fact that the force is greater because of there being water above, but nevertheless yield significantly different results.
 
Shoelace Thm. said:
I have one representation being [itex]\vec{F} = 62.4 * 2 * \pi*45 \int^1_0 x\,dx + \pi*45^2*49[/itex], where dx is a differential movement from the top of the 1 ft band to the base of the tank, and the other being [itex]\vec{F} = 62.4 * 2 * \pi*45 \int^{50}_{49} x\,dx[/itex], where dx represents the same. Both expressions take into account the fact that the force is greater because of there being water above, but nevertheless yield significantly different results.

The pi*45^2*49 you are adding in the first case has nothing to do with the force exerted by the first 49 feet of water. What should it be? If you'd put units on things, you'd see it doesn't even have correct units.
 
Would [itex]62.4lbs/ft^3*\pi*45^2ft^2*49ft[/itex] be correct?
 
And if so the answers are still inconsistent.
 
You want to add the force due to the pressure of the first 49 feet of water on the area around the side of the bottom foot of the pool. What would that be?
 
I can't think of an expression because the 49 ft of water in question is not even in contact with the bottom 1 ft of the tank, in which case I can't find a reasonable way to incorporate the fact that the bottom 1 ft of water is "submerged" beneath 49 ft of water.
 
Shoelace Thm. said:
I can't think of an expression because the 49 ft of water in question is not even in contact with the bottom 1 ft of the tank, in which case I can't find a reasonable way to incorporate the fact that the bottom 1 ft of water is "submerged" beneath 49 ft of water.

The pressure of the 49 ft of water adds to the pressure of the last foot of water. It doesn't have to be in direct contact. What's wrong with doing it with your 49 to 50 integral?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K