Undergrad Hypatia, Elliptic orbits, conic sections

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Hypatia is often credited with proposing the concept of elliptical orbits, stemming from her studies of conic sections. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding her contributions compared to those of Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton, emphasizing that Kepler's laws of planetary motion were based on empirical observations prior to Newton's theoretical framework. The validity of Hypatia's claim remains uncertain, as no primary sources substantiate her proposal of elliptical orbits, and some sources suggest this idea may originate from popular interpretations rather than historical evidence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conic sections and their properties
  • Familiarity with Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Knowledge of Newton's contributions to classical mechanics
  • Awareness of historical context regarding ancient astronomers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical contributions of Hypatia to mathematics and astronomy
  • Study Kepler's laws of planetary motion in detail
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of conic sections
  • Investigate the sources and interpretations of historical scientific claims
USEFUL FOR

Historians, astronomers, mathematicians, and anyone interested in the evolution of astronomical theories and the contributions of ancient scholars like Hypatia.

JTC
Messages
100
Reaction score
6
I understand that Hypatia proposed elliptic orbits.
I also understand she studied conic sections.
And, of course, one of the intersections of an inclined plane through a cone is elliptical.

So now my question: if she did propose elliptic orbits (not interested in who may also have done it), what motivated her? If it was a result of her study of conic sections, then what is it about conic sections that compelled her to extend it to planetary orbits?

With Kepler, et. al. we can see his three laws of planetary motion, etc, ounded in mathematics. But what drove Hypatia? All I can envision is a leap from conic sections to orbits, but I cannot see how she made the leap. Or was it just a lucky guess?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
JTC said:
With Kepler, et. al. we can see it was re-derivations and applications of Newton's work.

I don't know the answer to your main question, but what do you mean by this? Kepler died before Newton was born.
 
JTC said:
With Kepler, et. al. we can see it was re-derivations and applications of Newton's work. But what drove Hypatia? All I can envision is a leap from conic sections to orbits, but I cannot see how she made the leap. Or was it just a lucky guess?
As already pointed out, Kelper's laws came before Newton. Kepler law's were based on careful measurement of the planets. He observed that planets followed certain rules as they orbited the Sun. Newton later came along to give a theoretical basis for these observations Kepler made about planetary motion.
 
Janus said:
As already pointed out, Kelper's laws came before Newton. Kepler law's were based on careful measurement of the planets. He observed that planets followed certain rules as they orbited the Sun. Newton later came along to give a theoretical basis for these observations Kepler made about planetary motion.

Yes, sorry about that. I had this in my head --and conflated it over the three laws of each -- and did not even think before posting. I have corrected the post, since that was not the point; and I don't want the original question hijacked. Sorry.
 
What is your source for the claim that Hypatia proposed elliptical orbits? I have not seen this one!
 
mfig said:
What is your source for the claim that Hypatia proposed elliptical orbits? I have not seen this one!

I do not recall. I know I read it somewhere. Are you suggesting I am wrong? If so, I would like to know. I really thought she had proposed elliptical orbits.
 
This page http://historybooksreview.co.uk/what-did-hypatia-know-science-of-agora/ suggests the claim is from a movie, and describes it as a "bold assertion". It does note that it's plausible that she had access to information and techniques that would have allowed her to deduce that orbits were ellipses, but says there are no surviving primary sources.

I'm not in a position to comment on the veracity of any of this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
174
Views
20K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K