Hypergeometric equation at z = infinity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the transformation of a differential equation involving hypergeometric functions. By substituting \( z = \zeta^{-1} \) and \( u = \zeta^{\alpha}v(\zeta) \), the original equation is successfully reduced to a new form. Participants confirm the correct expressions for derivatives and discuss algebraic manipulations necessary for solving the equation. The final consensus is that the transformed equation can be solved using hypergeometric functions, with corrections made to previous derivative calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, particularly second-order linear equations.
  • Familiarity with hypergeometric functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of variable substitution techniques in calculus.
  • Proficiency in manipulating derivatives, including the chain rule and product rule.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of hypergeometric functions, specifically \( F(\alpha, \beta, \gamma; z) \).
  • Learn about the method of Frobenius for solving differential equations near singular points.
  • Explore the application of Mathematica for symbolic computation in solving differential equations.
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions on the solutions of transformed differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, researchers in applied mathematics, and anyone involved in solving complex differential equations, particularly those related to hypergeometric functions.

jncarter
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that by letting z = \zeta^-1 and u = \zeta^{\alpha}v(\zeta) that the differential equation,
z(1-z)\frac{d^{2}u(z)}{d^{2}z}+{\gamma - (\alpha+\beta+1)z}\frac{du(z)}{dz}-\alpha \beta u(z) = 0​
can be reduced to
\zeta(1-\zeta)\frac{d^{2}v(\zeta)}{d\zeta^{2}} + {\alpha-\beta+1-(2\alpha-\gamma+2)\zeta}\frac{dv(\zeta)}{d\zeta}-\alpha(\alpha-\gamma+1)v(\zeta) = 0​
and find the solutions of the first equation about z = ∞ in therms of hypergeometric functions of z.

Homework Equations


The first solution to the top equation about z=0 is given by
u_{1} = 1 + \Sigma^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{(\alpha)_{n}(\beta)_{n}}{(\gamma)_{n}n!}z^{n} = F(\alpha,\beta,\beta;z)

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I'm trying to find expressions for all of the derivatives.
z=\zeta^{-1}<br /> dz=-\zeta^{-2}d\zeta<br /> \frac{d\zeta}{dz}=-\zeta^{2}
First question, is this the correct expression for d2z? I am concerned that I may have to use the chain rule in some manner that I am missing.
\frac{d^{2}\zeta}{dz^{2}} = 2\zeta^{-3} or d^{2}z = d(-\zeta^{-2}d\zeta) = 2 \zeta^{-3}d\zeta - \zeta^{-2}d^{2}\zeta
which gives some funny expression for \frac{d^{2}\zeta}{dz^{2}}
\frac{d}{dz}=\frac{d\zeta}{dz}\frac{d}{d\zeta} = -\zeta^{2}\frac{d}{d\zeta}
\frac{d^{2}}{dz^{2}} = \frac{d^{2}\zeta}{dz^{2}}\frac{d^{2}}{d\zeta^{2}} = \frac{\zeta^{3}}{2}\frac{d^{2}}{d\zeta^{2}}
Now the next part can be done in a different order, but I have decided to go with a method that seems to be more careful.
\frac{du}{dz} = \frac{d}{dz}(\zeta^{\alpha}v)
= \frac{d}{dz} \zeta^{\alpha} v+\zeta^{\alpha} \frac{dv}{dz}
Now use \frac{d}{dz}(\zeta^{\alpha}) = \frac{d}{dz}(z^{-\alpha}) = -\alpha \zeta^{\alpha - 1} to get
\frac{du}{dz} = -\alpha \zeta^{\alpha - 1} v + \zeta^{\alpha}\frac{dv}{dz}
= -\alpha \zeta^{\alpha - 1} v - \zeta^{\alpha+2}\frac{dv}{d \zeta}
Similarly,
\frac{d^{2}u}{dz^2} = \frac{d^2}{dz^2}(\zeta^{\alpha})v + 2 \frac{d}{dz}(\zeta^{\alpha}) \frac{dv}{dz} + \zeta^{\alpha} \frac{d^2 v}{dz^2}
= - \alpha (\alpha - 1)\zeta^{\alpha -2} v +2 \alpha \zeta^{\alpha-1} \frac{dv}{d \zeta} +\frac{1}{2} \zeta^{\alpha +3} \frac{d^{2}v}{d \zeta^{2}}
I've tried plugging this all in a couple of different times and keep getting weird answers. More specifically, I can't seem to get the \zeta (1- \zeta)\frac{d^{2}v}{d\zeta^{2}}. So I tried finding common factors that I could divide out of the equation. So far, it's been no good. This got me thinking that maybe I had the incorrect expression for the second derivatives. Please take a look at my work and point out any problems. I always find that a fresh pair of eyes is enlightening in these problems. Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure I'm following your work. Here's what I'd do for the first one. If:

z=\frac{1}{\zeta}\rightarrow \zeta=\frac{1}{z}

u=\zeta^{-\alpha} v(\zeta)

then:

\begin{align}<br /> \frac{du}{dz}&amp;=\frac{du}{d\zeta}\frac{d\zeta}{dz} \\<br /> &amp;=\left(\zeta^{-\alpha}v&#039;-\alpha \zeta^{-\alpha-1}v\right)\left(-\frac{1}{z^2}\right)\\<br /> &amp;=\vdots \\<br /> &amp;=-\frac{1}{\zeta^2}\left(\zeta^{-\alpha}v&#039;-\alpha\zeta^{-\alpha-1}v\right)<br /> \end{align}<br />
 
Oops, u = \zeta^{\alpha}v.
\zeta = z^{-1} → d\zeta = -z^{-2}dz=-\zeta^{2} → \frac{d\zeta}{dz}=-\zeta^{2}
Note the positive in the \zeta], since z has a negative exponent, \zeta has a positive one.
\frac{du}{dz}=\frac{du}{d\zeta} \frac{d\zeta}{dz} = -\zeta^{2}\frac{d}{d\zeta}(\zeta^{\alpha})
\frac{d}{d\zeta}(\zeta^{\alpha}v) = \alpha \zeta^{\alpha -1}v+\zeta^{\alpha}\frac{dv}{d\zeta}
Plus this into \frac{du}{dz} and do some algebra:
\frac{du}{dz} = -\alpha \zeta^{\alpha -1}v - \zeta^{\alpha+2}\frac{dv}{d\zeta}
So I think I had a +1 where there should have been a +1 in the first term. I'm still concerned about the second derivatives. Will reply in a bit once I do some work...
 
Okay, new attempt at the second derivative:
\frac{d^2}{dz^2}(z^{-1})=2z^{-3}=2\zeta^{3}
\frac{d^2}{d\zeta^2}(\zeta^{\alpha}v) = v\frac{d^2}{d\zeta^2}(\zeta^{\alpha}) + \zeta^{\alpha} \frac{d^2v}{d\zeta^2}
\rightarrow = \alpha(\alpha-1)\zeta^{\alpha-2}v+\zeta^{\alpha}\frac{d^2v}{d\zeta^2}
\frac{d^2u}{dz^2} = \frac{d^2u}{d\zeta^2}\frac{d^2\zeta}{dz^2} = 2\zeta^3\frac{d^2}{d\zeta^2}(\zeta^{\alpha}v)
\rightarrow = 2\alpha(\alpha - 1)\zeta^{\alpha +1}v+2 \zeta^{\alpha + 3}\frac{d^2v}{d\zeta^2}

Does that look about right?
 
If:

\zeta=1/z\rightarrow \frac{d\zeta}{dz}=-\frac{1}{z^2}=-\zeta^2

u=\zeta^{\alpha}v

then I get:
\begin{align}<br /> \frac{du}{dz}&amp;=\left(\zeta^{\alpha}v&#039;+\alpha \zeta^{\alpha-1}v\right)\frac{d\zeta}{dz}\\<br /> &amp;=\vdots \\<br /> &amp;=\alpha\zeta^{\alpha+1}v-\zeta^{\alpha+2}v&#039;<br /> \end{align}<br />

and then one more time:

<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \frac{du}{dz}&amp;=\alpha[\left(\zeta^{\alpha+1}v&#039;+(\alpha+1)\zeta^{\alpha}v\right)(-\zeta^2)]-[\left(\zeta^{\alpha+2}v&#039;&#039;+(\alpha+2)\zeta^{\alpha+1}v&#039;\right)(-\zeta^2)\\<br /> &amp;=\alpha[-\zeta^{\alpha+3}v&#039;-(\alpha+1)\zeta^{\alpha+2}v]+\zeta^{\alpha+2}v&#039;&#039;+(\alpha+2)\zeta^{\alpha+2}v&#039;<br /> \end{align}<br />




. . . ok, I'm struggling with it. Not sure I have it exactly right.
 
Last edited:
jackmell said:
If:

\zeta=1/z\rightarrow \frac{d\zeta}{dz}=-\frac{1}{z^2}=-\zeta^2

u=\zeta^{\alpha}v

then I get:
\begin{align}<br /> \frac{du}{dz}&amp;=\left(\zeta^{\alpha}v&#039;+\alpha \zeta^{\alpha-1}v\right)\frac{d\zeta}{dz}\\<br /> &amp;=\vdots \\<br /> &amp;=\alpha\zeta^{\alpha+1}v-\zeta^{\alpha+2}v&#039;<br /> \end{align}<br />
You lost a negative sign \frac{du}{dz} = -\alpha \zeta^{\alpha+1}v- \zeta^{\alpha+2}v&#039;
I haven't checked the other part of your work yet.
My last post may also be wrong. I found this formula somewhere
\frac{d^2}{dx^2}(uv) = \frac{d^2 u}{dx^2}v+2\frac{du}{dx}\frac{dv}{dx}+u\frac{d^2 v}{dx^2}
where u=u(x) and v=v(x). I used this in my first post, where \zeta^{\alpha} was the u in the last equation and dx becomes dζ.
With the correction to the powers I found
\frac{d^2 u}{d\zeta^2}=2 \alpha( \alpha-1) \zeta^{\alpha+1}v+4 \alpha \zeta^{\alpha+2}v&#039;+2 \zeta^{\alpha+3}v&#039;&#039;
 
jncarter said:

Homework Statement


Show that by letting z = \zeta^-1 and u = \zeta^{\alpha}v(\zeta) that the differential equation,
z(1-z)\frac{d^{2}u(z)}{d^{2}z}+{\gamma - (\alpha+\beta+1)z}\frac{du(z)}{dz}-\alpha \beta u(z) = 0​
can be reduced to
\zeta(1-\zeta)\frac{d^{2}v(\zeta)}{d\zeta^{2}} + {\alpha-\beta+1-(2\alpha-\gamma+2)\zeta}\frac{dv(\zeta)}{d\zeta}-\alpha(\alpha-\gamma+1)v(\zeta) = 0​

I believe your latex caused the equations to be displayed incorrectly. I think they should be:

z(1-z)\frac{d^{2}u(z)}{d^{2}z}+\big[\gamma - (\alpha+\beta+1)z\big]\frac{du(z)}{dz}-\alpha \beta u(z) = 0

can be reduced to
\zeta(1-\zeta)\frac{d^{2}v(\zeta)}{d\zeta^{2}} + \big[\alpha-\beta+1-(2\alpha-\gamma+2)\zeta\big]\frac{dv(\zeta)}{d\zeta}-\alpha(\alpha-\gamma+1)v(\zeta) = 0

Once that's done then what we're doing above, minus the arithmetic errors, will yield those results I believe. I'm frustrated with all those greek letters in there so I used a,b, c and d and stuff and then just ran it through Mathematica (yeah I know, I'm not proud). When I do that I get for the second derivative (in Mathematica Latex):

a y^{2+a} v[y]+a^2 y^{2+a} v[y]+2 y^{3+a} v&#039;[y]+2 a y^{3+a} v&#039;[y]+y^{4+a} v&#039;&#039;[y]

where a is alpha and y is zeta. Pretty sure that's correct now because when I substitute everything in the first equation above, I get the second one.. Also checked a reduced version numerically so I think we're good now.
 
Last edited:
You're right about that second equation. That was my bad forgetting parentheses. I also got the chance to talk to my TA yesterday, and you're right about the second derivative. Thanks for all the help. There's just so much algebra with this type of problem, it's easy to lose track of things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K