Hypothetical situation: circuit with 0 resistance

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a hypothetical scenario involving a closed loop circuit with zero resistance and the effects of an induced electromotive force (emf) when a magnetic field is applied. Participants explore the implications of self-induction and the behavior of current in such a circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of having a current in a zero-resistance loop when a magnetic field is introduced, questioning the resulting behavior of current and emf. There are attempts to reconcile the concept of infinite current with the principles of self-induction and counteracting emf.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of zero-resistance circuits and self-induction. Some participants suggest that the current will not go to infinity due to the induced emf opposing changes in flux, while others seek clarification on the formal reasoning behind these phenomena.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of assumptions regarding the nature of resistance and flux in the circuit, with references to superconductors and the behavior of coils under varying conditions. Participants are navigating the complexities of these concepts without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
1. Consider a closed loop which already has a current ##I## running through it while the resistance of this loop is ##R=0##. I now suddenly start tuning on a homogenous magnetic field through the loop which gives raise to an emf in the loop ##\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi}{dt}##. What will happen?

My personal reasoning is that this emf can be interpreted the same as turning on a sudden voltage in this loop. In this case since the resistance is zero the current wil go to infinity or minus infinity depending on the induced field.

This does not happen it seems according to what I remember from class and has something to do with self-induction. I don't remember the full argument though so I would appreciate it if someone could help me out to reason this through correctly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Coffee_ said:
1. Consider a closed loop which already has a current ##I## running through it while the resistance of this loop is ##R=0##. I now suddenly start tuning on a homogenous magnetic field through the loop which gives raise to an emf in the loop ##\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi}{dt}##. What will happen?

My personal reasoning is that this emf can be interpreted the same as turning on a sudden voltage in this loop. In this case since the resistance is zero the current wil go to infinity or minus infinity depending on the induced field.

This does not happen it seems according to what I remember from class and has something to do with self-induction. I don't remember the full argument though so I would appreciate it if someone could help me out to reason this through correctly.

You mean you have a current circulating in a superconducting coil? That's about the only way I can think of having a current continuously circulating in a zero resistance coil.

Anyway, for your question, a zero resistance coil acts as a "shorted turn" for external flux changes piercing the coil. The shorted turn supports a changing reverse current that is the correct magnitude to cancel out the changing flux that is piercing the coil (it is not an infinite current).
 
If you have an emf of ε in the loop the current I will continuously rise according to ε = L (dI/dt), (with L the self-inductance of the loop) but the current will also produce an emf.
 
berkeman said:
You mean you have a current circulating in a superconducting coil? That's about the only way I can think of having a current continuously circulating in a zero resistance coil.

Anyway, for your question, a zero resistance coil acts as a "shorted turn" for external flux changes piercing the coil. The shorted turn supports a changing reverse current that is the correct magnitude to cancel out the changing flux that is piercing the coil (it is not an infinite current).

Well not really a superconductor because we assume the B-field can be non zero here. It's just a hypothetical exercise.
 
Coffee_ said:
Well not really a superconductor because we assume the B-field can be non zero here. It's just a hypothetical exercise.

But that's the point. If the resistance of this shorted turn is zero, you get zero changing flux through it. If there is a finite resistance, you get a reduced changing flux through it.
 
willem2 said:
If you have an emf of ε in the loop the current I will continuously rise according to ε = L (dI/dt), (with L the self-inductance of the loop) but the current will also produce an emf.

So, tell me if I get it correctly. The change in external ##B## field will want to make ##I## go to infinity as there is no resistance but since as ##I## starts rising quickly it will induce a counter acting emf to keep this for happening. What will the final situation be?
 
berkeman said:
But that's the point. If the resistance of this shorted turn is zero, you get zero changing flux through it. If there is a finite resistance, you get a reduced changing flux through it.

You get zero changing flux but you can still have a constant flux all the time. From what I understood about superconductors they can't have a flux at all in them.
 
Coffee_ said:
So, tell me if I get it correctly. The change in external ##B## field will want to make ##I## go to infinity as there is no resistance but since as ##I## starts rising quickly it will induce a counter acting emf to keep this for happening. What will the final situation be?

Think of the external flux changing sinusoidally (since you can't ramp a flux up forever). That sinusoidal flux will induce a reverse current in the 0-Ohm coil that opposes the external flux, resulting in zero net flux through the coil That's what a shorted turn does, and it does not take "infinite current".
 
Coffee_ said:
You get zero changing flux but you can still have a constant flux all the time. From what I understood about superconductors they can't have a flux at all in them.

Bingo! Because the zero resistance acts as an ideal shorted turn! :-)
 
  • #10
Coffee_ said:
1. Consider a closed loop which already has a current ##I## running through it while the resistance of this loop is ##R=0##. I now suddenly start tuning on a homogenous magnetic field through the loop which gives raise to an emf in the loop ##\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi}{dt}##. What will happen?

My personal reasoning is that this emf can be interpreted the same as turning on a sudden voltage in this loop. In this case since the resistance is zero the current wil go to infinity or minus infinity depending on the induced field.

This does not happen it seems according to what I remember from class and has something to do with self-induction. I don't remember the full argument though so I would appreciate it if someone could help me out to reason this through correctly.
You would not be able to change the net flux thru the coil. The slightest external dφ/dt would produce an arbitrarily high counter-flux to keep the existing φ from changing. There would be no net change in the net flux, which would remain at φ = Li where L is the coil's self-inductance.

Superconducting levitated rail works that way. If the train tries to drop towards the superconducting rail coils, the reult is an immediate "infinite" coil current which works against the train's magnets so no dφ/dt can take place, hence no vertical train motion.
 
  • #11
rude man said:
You would not be able to change the net flux thru the coil. The slightest external dφ/dt would produce an arbitrarily high counter-flux to keep the existing φ from changing. There would be no net change in the net flux, which would remain at φ = Li where L is the coil's self-inductance.

Superconducting levitated rail works that way. If the train tries to drop towards the superconducting rail coils, the reult is an immediate "infinite" coil current which works against the train's magnets so no dφ/dt can take place, hence no vertical train motion.

Thanks for answering. I understand now that this happens but how do you know this. What is the formal reasoning to go from ##\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi}{dt}## towards the fact that the net flux can't change? I know all the separate phenomena like self induction and ##L\frac{dI}{dt}## and so on but seem to not be able to put them together in a strong argument in this case.
 
  • #12
Coffee_ said:
Thanks for answering. I understand now that this happens but how do you know this. What is the formal reasoning to go from ##\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi}{dt}## towards the fact that the net flux can't change? I know all the separate phenomena like self induction and ##L\frac{dI}{dt}## and so on but seem to not be able to put them together in a strong argument in this case.
If R=0 then emf must = 0 too since emf = Ri. So ##\epsilon=-\frac{d\Phi}{dt}## = 0. So φ can't change.
OK let's 'do the math':
Assume R is finite for the moment. The NET dφ/dt comprises the rate of change of the external flux φe plus that of the self-induced flux φi, the latter being of opposite sign by Lenz's law:
dφ/dt = dφe/dt + dφi/dt = emf
but dφi/dt = -L di/dt so
dφ/dt = dφe/dt - L di/dt = Ri.
Let's assume a step external input ramp in time: φe(t) = φedot t, i.e. ramp rate = φedot = constant.
We then have a first-order, linear ODE, easily solved for i(t). We now impose R → 0; I will leave the details to you:
i(t) = φedot t/L + i0
where i0 = your original current.
So di/dt =φedot/L
and L di/dt =φedot
so if we add the two separate flux rates we get
dφ/dt = L di/dt - L di/dt = 0.
So the net flux thru the coil never changes. i builds up linearly over time to just balance out the applied external flux change.

You can use other forcing functions for the external rate, for example
φe = φ0sin(wt) etc. to see the same result.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K