I am confused by the concept of space-time in special relativity

AI Thread Summary
Space-time in special relativity combines three spatial dimensions with one time dimension, creating a unified framework known as Minkowski spacetime. In contrast, Newtonian physics operates with Galilean spacetime, where space and time are treated as separate entities, leading to less frequent references to the term "spacetime." The intertwining of space and time in special relativity reflects the effects of relative motion on measurements of time and distance. This distinction clarifies why "spacetime" is more commonly associated with Einstein's theories rather than Newton's. Understanding these differences is essential for grasping the implications of relativity.
rgtr
Messages
90
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
I am confused by the concept of space-time in special relativity, I have 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimensions. In Newtonian physics don't I also have 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension? Then why call it space time in special relativity and not in Newtonian physics?
Relevant Equations
No equations
I am confused by the concept of space-time in special relativity, I have 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimensions. In Newtonian physics don't I also have 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension? Then why call it space time in special relativity and not in Newtonian physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is called spacetime in Newtonian physics too.

The difference is that Newtonian physics has Galilean spacetime where space and time are much less intertwined than in the Minkowski spacetime of special relativity or the general Lorentzian manifolds of general relativity. It istherefore much less common to talk about spacetime in Newtonian physics.
 
Thanks.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why is time = ct and not t in special relativty?
Replies
3
Views
1K
How to Visualize a 4 vector (e.g. a velocity)?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Proper Time and Time Dilatation
Replies
1
Views
1K
How does relativity affect the detection of atmospheric muons?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Does string theory falsify the theory of special relativity?
Replies
19
Views
2K
Question on special relativity from "Basic Relativity"
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
Special Relativity - Which reference frame experiences which time?
Replies
36
Views
3K
Speed of a star in Special Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
Interpretation of Negative Time in Minkowski Diagram
Replies
1
Views
733
Special relativity - Trivial exercise with spacetime interval
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top