I don't know how to calculate a tennis racquet head size thanks

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter YKD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Head Tennis Thanks
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the head size of a tennis racquet, which is described as having an egg shape rather than a standard oval. Participants explore various methods and formulas for approximating the area, considering both mathematical and practical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the racquet head is egg-shaped, suggesting that there is no straightforward formula due to the variability in shapes.
  • Another participant proposes using the area formula for an ellipse, A = πab, where a and b represent half the dimensions of the racquet head.
  • A participant mentions conflicting head size measurements, with one source stating 89.5 square inches and the brand stating 93 square inches, and seeks clarification on which calculation method to use.
  • Integration is suggested as a more accurate method for calculating the area by plotting half the racquet and finding the area under the curve.
  • One participant shares specific dimensions of their racquet stringbed and calculates an approximate area of 86.6 square inches using the formula 12.25 * 9 * π / 4, suggesting that rounding may be necessary due to the shape.
  • There is a recognition that the racquet's shape complicates the calculation, and participants express uncertainty about the best approach to take.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best method to calculate the racquet head size, with no consensus reached on a single approach. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in accurately determining the area due to the racquet's shape.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of using standard formulas due to the unique shape of the racquet head, and there are unresolved questions regarding the accuracy of different calculation methods.

YKD
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
The area of a tennis racquet head size is like an egg shape, not oval shape.
how to calculate it?

Thank you so much for your help ^_^
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately there are just too many different shapes for an "egg shape" for there to be any good formula. I think you will have to approximate the area by treating it as if the tennis racquet head were an oval or an "ellipse" for which there is an area formula: A= \pi ab where a and b are half the distance across the racquet head measured where it is narrowest and widest.

In other words, you are really using the formula for area of a circle, but, because an "ellipse" does not have a single "radius", instead of r2, you multiply together the values for smallest "radius" and largest "radius".
 
Thank you, HallsofIvy ^_^
The headsize of my racquet is 89.5 square inch that someone said
but the brand said 93.
Using W x L x 0.8 is closer to this area.
I should use 22/7 x a x b or W x L x 0.8 to caculate the racquet headsize?
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/viewlarge.html?PCODE=LMP

I'd like to calculate it by myself.

Thanks!
 
YKD said:
Thank you, HallsofIvy ^_^
The headsize of my racquet is 89.5 square inch that someone said
but the brand said 93.
Using W x L x 0.8 is closer to this area.
I should use 22/7 x a x b or W x L x 0.8 to caculate the racquet headsize?
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/viewlarge.html?PCODE=LMP

I'd like to calculate it by myself.

Thanks!

Yes that would be a good idea.

Another idea to do might to be use Integration (just plot half the racquet onto the aces, find the area under the curve, then multiply by 2), though I'm not sure if you have done that before, but either way, it probably will be more accurate.
 
Invictious said:
Yes that would be a good idea.

Another idea to do might to be use Integration (just plot half the racquet onto the aces, find the area under the curve, then multiply by 2), though I'm not sure if you have done that before, but either way, it probably will be more accurate.

It seems quite complicated...
Almost forget to add:
My racquet stringbed (hoop not included)
length:12.25 inch, width 9 inch

Could you please help me calculate it from the link I posted?

Thank you ^_^
 
YKD said:
My racquet stringbed (hoop not included)
length:12.25 inch, width 9 inch

I took the picture and put an ellipse with that ratio inside the stringbed and found that it fit fairly well. If it touches on the top, bottom, and two sides there's a tiny bit of space on the diagonals (thus egg-shaped rather than elliptical) so whatever area we calculate should probably be rounded up sooner than down.

12.25 * 9 * pi / 4 is about 86.6, so I'd say an area of 87 or 88 square inches wouldn't be out of line.
 

Attachments

  • racquet.jpg
    racquet.jpg
    12.2 KB · Views: 838
CRGreathouse said:
I took the picture and put an ellipse with that ratio inside the stringbed and found that it fit fairly well. If it touches on the top, bottom, and two sides there's a tiny bit of space on the diagonals (thus egg-shaped rather than elliptical) so whatever area we calculate should probably be rounded up sooner than down.

12.25 * 9 * pi / 4 is about 86.6, so I'd say an area of 87 or 88 square inches wouldn't be out of line.

Thank you very much, CRGreathouse ^_^

Perhaps this racquet is difficult to calculate,right?
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/viewlarge.html?PCODE=RQIS1T
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
753
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K