I don't understand how to differentiate integrals

[sarahaha44]

I am in Calculus 2 and we're just reviewing calc 1. Can someone break down the concept of differentiating definite integrals for me? I am mostly struggling on the trig functions. The problem I am stuck on is
∫^{}x_{}0 cos(t^{}2) dt

 

[Simon Bridge]

You exploit the fact that the integration is the inverse of differentiation, so:

$$\int \frac{d}{dt}y(t)dt = y(t) + c$$ and $$\frac{d}{dt}\int y(t)dt = y(t) + c$$... for indefinite integrals. For definite integrals, the next step is to apply the limits.

But it looks like you want something a but different ... the chain rule for integrating $$\int x_0\cos(t^2)dt$$ ... is that correct?

If you want to evaluate: $$\int f(g(x))g^\prime(x).dx$$ then you can put $u=g(x)$ then solve to find out what dx is. When you make the substitution, you end up evaluating the integral of f(u)du which may be easier to do. That what you are after?

 

[Mark44]

I am in Calculus 2 and we're just reviewing calc 1. Can someone break down the concept of differentiating definite integrals for me? I am mostly struggling on the trig functions. The problem I am stuck on is
∫^{}x_{}0 cos(t^{}2) dt

I think this is what you were trying to write:
$$ \int_0^x cos(t^2)dt$$

Click what I wrote to see my LaTeX script, or click Quote on my post.

You exploit the fact that the integration is the inverse of differentiation, so:

But it looks like you want something a but different ... the chain rule for integrating $$\int x_0\cos(t^2)dt$$ ... is that correct?

I don't think so. I believe that 0 and x were the lower and upper limits of integration.

 

[Simon Bridge]

I don't think so. I believe that 0 and x were the lower and upper limits of integration.

Yeah that makes sense... we'll soon see :)

That particular example looks a tad rough for level 2 - have they just learned Fresnel integrals or something?

 

[elfmotat]

All you need to do is exploit the fundamental theorem of calculus:

\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt = F(h(x))-F(g(x))
So differentiating via the chain rule gives:

\frac{d}{dx} \int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt = f(h(x))h'(x)-f(g(x))g'(x)
In the OP's example g(x)=0 and h(x)=x, so:

\frac{d}{dx} \int_{0}^{x} cos(t^2) dt = cos(x^2)-0

 

[sarahaha44]

I think this is what you were trying to write:
$$ \int_0^x cos(t^2)dt$$

Click what I wrote to see my LaTeX script, or click Quote on my post.

I don't think so. I believe that 0 and x were the lower and upper limits of integration.

Yes! This is what I was trying to write - sorry, new to the site :)

 

[sarahaha44]

All you need to do is exploit the fundamental theorem of calculus:

\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt = F(h(x))-F(g(x))
So differentiating via the chain rule gives:

\frac{d}{dx} \int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt = f(h(x))h'(x)-f(g(x))g'(x)
In the OP's example g(x)=0 and h(x)=x, so:

\frac{d}{dx} \int_{0}^{x} cos(t^2) dt = cos(x^2)-0

Ah thank you! Life makes sense again haha

 

[sarahaha44]

All you need to do is exploit the fundamental theorem of calculus:

\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt = F(h(x))-F(g(x))
So differentiating via the chain rule gives:

\frac{d}{dx} \int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt = f(h(x))h'(x)-f(g(x))g'(x)
In the OP's example g(x)=0 and h(x)=x, so:

\frac{d}{dx} \int_{0}^{x} cos(t^2) dt = cos(x^2)-0

Actually I am unclear with your last step there. So f(h(x))h'(x) equals x, do you just plug x in for t? What if it equaled x²? Would it end up being cos x⁴? Hypothetically speaking.

 

[elfmotat]

Actually I am unclear with your last step there. So f(h(x))h'(x) equals x, do you just plug x in for t? What if it equaled x²? Would it end up being cos x⁴? Hypothetically speaking.

If you were integrating from 0 to x², you would get:

2xcos(x^4)

 

[HallsofIvy]

The "fundamental theorem of calculus" (part of it) says the if F(x)= \int f(x) dx, then dF/dx= f(x). That says that d/dx \int_a^x f(t)dt= f(x). (The other part says that if f(x)= dF/dx, then F(x)= \int f(x)dx+ C for some constant C.)

"Leibniz's formula" is more general:
\frac{d}{dx}\int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} f(x,t)dt=f(x, \beta(x))\frac{d\beta(x)}{dx}- f(x, \alpha(x))\frac{d\alpha(x)}{dx}+ \int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \frac{\partial f(x, t)}{\partial x}dt.

The "fundamental theorem" is clearly a special case of "Leibniz's formula" with \alpha(x)= 0, so that d\alpha/dx= 0, \beta(x)= x so that d\beta/dx= 1 and f(t) not a function of x so that \partial f/\partial x= 0:
\frac{d}{dx}\int_0^x f(t)dt= (1)f(x)- (0)f(0)+ \int_0^x 0 dt= f(x).

To do the initial example, d/dx\int_0^x cos(t^2)dt, you just need the "fundamental theorem", d/dx\int_0^x cos(t^2)dt= cos(x^2).

To do the example elfmotat gives, d/dx \int_0^{x^2} cos(t^2)dt take \beta(x)= x^2, so that d\beta/dx= 2x, and \alpha(x)= 0. f(x, t)= cos(t^2) which does NOT depend on x so that \partial f/\partial x= 0. Leibniz' forumula becomes
2x cos((x^2)^2)- 0 cos(0^2)+ \int_0^{x^2} 0 dt= 2x cos(x^4).