iScience
- 466
- 5
i understand the linear case...
example..
#/{(x+5)(x-4)} ----> A/(x+5) + B/(x-4)
but i don't understand this..
example..
#/{(x^2+3)(x^2+9)}------>(Ax+B)/{(x-√3)(x+√3)} + (Cx+D)/(x^2+9)
first of all... (x-√3)(x+√3)= x^2-3, which is nowhere in the original equation.. it's supposed to be x^2+3 no? so why then.. (x-√3)(x+√3)? and mainly.. i don't understand the whole.. "Ax+B" in the numerators for terms that have denominators on the bottom. why?
why does it not make sense to do the following?...
#/{(x^2+3)(x^2+9)}-----> A/(x^2+3) + B/(x^2+9)
-------------------------------------------------------------
why also.. for repeated linear factors do we do this?
example..
(2x+2)/{(x+5)^2}------> A/(x+5) + B/{(x+5)^2}
................
i know there's kind of a lot here to answer so i don't expect every person to answer everything so if you choose to answer specific cases that i asked about, please put the specific question that you are answering in quotes. thanks guys
example..
#/{(x+5)(x-4)} ----> A/(x+5) + B/(x-4)
but i don't understand this..
example..
#/{(x^2+3)(x^2+9)}------>(Ax+B)/{(x-√3)(x+√3)} + (Cx+D)/(x^2+9)
first of all... (x-√3)(x+√3)= x^2-3, which is nowhere in the original equation.. it's supposed to be x^2+3 no? so why then.. (x-√3)(x+√3)? and mainly.. i don't understand the whole.. "Ax+B" in the numerators for terms that have denominators on the bottom. why?
why does it not make sense to do the following?...
#/{(x^2+3)(x^2+9)}-----> A/(x^2+3) + B/(x^2+9)
-------------------------------------------------------------
why also.. for repeated linear factors do we do this?
example..
(2x+2)/{(x+5)^2}------> A/(x+5) + B/{(x+5)^2}
................
i know there's kind of a lot here to answer so i don't expect every person to answer everything so if you choose to answer specific cases that i asked about, please put the specific question that you are answering in quotes. thanks guys