I dont understand partial fractions for quadratic factors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of partial fraction decomposition (PFD) specifically for rational expressions with quadratic factors in the denominator. Participants explore the reasoning behind the structure of numerators and denominators in PFD, and address confusion regarding the factorization of quadratic expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses understanding of linear cases but struggles with quadratic factors, questioning why terms like (Ax+B) appear in the numerators for quadratic denominators.
  • Another participant points out that the initial factorization presented by the first participant is incorrect, stating that any resulting partial fraction decomposition would therefore be erroneous.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of having numerators of lesser degree than the denominators in PFD, which is essential for evaluating integrals of rational functions.
  • A participant explains that when dealing with improper rational expressions, one can perform polynomial long division to obtain a proper fraction, which is relevant to understanding PFD.
  • Clarification is provided that the form Ax+B is used for quadratic denominators to ensure the numerator is of lesser degree, thus maintaining the proper fraction requirement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial factorization presented, with some asserting it is incorrect while others seek clarification on the reasoning behind the structure of PFD. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific application of PFD to the examples given.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about factorization and the definitions of proper versus improper rational expressions. The mathematical steps involved in verifying the correctness of the decompositions are not fully explored.

iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
i understand the linear case...

example..

#/{(x+5)(x-4)} ----> A/(x+5) + B/(x-4)

but i don't understand this..

example..

#/{(x^2+3)(x^2+9)}------>(Ax+B)/{(x-√3)(x+√3)} + (Cx+D)/(x^2+9)

first of all... (x-√3)(x+√3)= x^2-3, which is nowhere in the original equation.. it's supposed to be x^2+3 no? so why then.. (x-√3)(x+√3)? and mainly.. i don't understand the whole.. "Ax+B" in the numerators for terms that have denominators on the bottom. why?

why does it not make sense to do the following?...

#/{(x^2+3)(x^2+9)}-----> A/(x^2+3) + B/(x^2+9)

-------------------------------------------------------------

why also.. for repeated linear factors do we do this?

example..

(2x+2)/{(x+5)^2}------> A/(x+5) + B/{(x+5)^2}

................

i know there's kind of a lot here to answer so i don't expect every person to answer everything so if you choose to answer specific cases that i asked about, please put the specific question that you are answering in quotes. thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know where you got your quadratic example from, but you have an incorrect factorization of the term x^2+3. As such, any partial fraction decomposition will necessarily be erroneous.

The whole point of PF decomposition is to obtain factors whose numerators are of lesser degree than the denominators. This technique (PF) is used to facilitate the evaluation of integrals of rational functions.

Once a partial fraction expression is obtained, it must be equivalent to the original expression. One checks this by adding the partial fractions together to see if the original expression results.
 
The goal in Partial Fraction Decomposition is to find the individual fractions which were summed from which the given rational expression came from. There are Proper Rational Expressions and Improper Rational Expressions. When the degree of the numerator is equal or greater than the degree of the denominator, then this is an Improper Rational Expression, and you can perform division which gives one or more terms AND a remainder. This remainder is a Proper Fraction.

When you study "ALGEBRA 1", you also learn to do sums or differences of rational expressions. You do the sum or difference, using if necessary the same "lowest" common denominator as you learned for ordinary base-ten numbers in fractions. You simplify, and you have your new rational expression. Partial Fraction Decomposition is just starting with the fraction, and reversing the process to find what the original summed fractions were.
 
iScience said:

#/{(x^2+3)(x^2+9)}------>(Ax+B)/{(x-√3)(x+√3)} + (Cx+D)/(x^2+9)

first of all... (x-√3)(x+√3)= x^2-3, which is nowhere in the original equation.. it's supposed to be x^2+3 no? so why then.. (x-√3)(x+√3)? and mainly.. i don't understand the whole.. "Ax+B" in the numerators for terms that have denominators on the bottom. why?

why does it not make sense to do the following?...

#/{(x^2+3)(x^2+9)}-----> A/(x^2+3) + B/(x^2+9)


You did not actually show the given portion being (x^2-9); but in fact showed the SUM of squares, so not factorable in Real numbers.

You were hoping for some explanation about quadratic factors in partial fraction decomposition. You want to prepare to make numerators of the type, Ax+B so that you can make proper partial fractions from your given rational expression with quadratic denominators or quadratic factors in the denominator.

You could have something like [itex]\frac{Ax+B}{Mx^2+Nx+P}[/itex] as one of your partial fractions, and it would be a PROPER fraction because the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator. You might, in fact, find either A=0 OR B=0 through the algebra steps, but you at least want to prepare for a possible binomial numerator. Note that a linear binomial numerator is degree 1 and the quadratic denominator is degree 2. This means the partial fraction would be a PROPER partial fraction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K