I get the answer, I just don't really understand why

  • Thread starter Thread starter A(s)
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces acting on a driver in a car as it travels over a circular hill and into a circular valley, specifically focusing on the normal force experienced at these points. The subject area includes concepts of circular motion, gravitational forces, and free-body diagrams.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of forces acting on the driver at the top of the hill and the bottom of the valley, questioning the role of normal force and centripetal force. There is an emphasis on understanding why the normal force is zero at the hill's crest and what forces are at play.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between gravitational force and normal force, particularly at the top of the hill. There is ongoing exploration of the conceptual understanding of forces, with participants drawing connections to free-body diagrams and the conditions under which normal force becomes zero.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of forces in non-flat scenarios and the conditions that lead to a normal force of zero, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the dynamics involved in circular motion.

A(s)
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
A car is driven at constant speed over a circular hill and then into a circular valley with the same radius. At the top of the hill, the normal force on the driver from the car seat is 0. The driver's mass is 70.0 kg. What is the magnitude of the normal force on the driver from the seat when the car passes through the bottom of the valley?

Answer:
ok, well the answer is 2x gravity.
and you can reason it out, saying, "well if the force from the first circle (F1) is enough to cancel gravity, then the normal force from the second circle must be equal to gravity (Fn = Fg), and the Fn +Fg = Fg + Fg = Fnet = 2Fg."

What I don't understand though, is what do you call the force when the car is traveling on the outside of the first circle that counteracts gravity?(F1)


Thanks in Advance,

Justin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the centripetal force. - the force needed to provide the change in velocity at the top of the curve.

Draw a free-body diagram of the forces on the car at both points. The sum of all forces has to equal the mass x acceleration. The only acceleration is the centripetal acceleration.

In the first case, the only force is the force of gravity down. There is no normal force. So F1 = mg

In the second case, the forces are gravity and the normal force. The Normal force acts in the opposite direction as mg. The centripetal force/acceleration is in the opposite direction. So F2 = -F1 = mg-N.

Since F1 = N - mg AND F1 = mg ...

AM
 
The only thing that bothers me is that in the first hill, Fn = Mg + X
there must be some x that counters gravity to make the Fn = 0
What is x?

Fn = Mg would be a car traveling on a flat hill.
 
lol flat hill... i meant flat ground
 
A(s) said:
The only thing that bothers me is that in the first hill, Fn = Mg + X
there must be some x that counters gravity to make the Fn = 0
What is x?

Fn = Mg would be a car traveling on a flat hill.

Fn = 0 because at the crest of the hill, both the driver and car are accelerating downwards at g. It's like being in a free fall situation -- like in an elevator if the cable suddenly snapped. I think you can see that if both the driver and the car are being pulled down by gravity, then obviously the seat is not going to be pressing up against the driver, counteracting his weight. That's why there is zero normal force on him, and he feels weightless.
 
true, that makes sense. Thank you
 
A(s) said:
The only thing that bothers me is that in the first hill, Fn = Mg + X
there must be some x that counters gravity to make the Fn = 0
What is x?

Fn = Mg would be a car traveling on a flat hill.
You avoid this conceptual problem if you draw a free body diagram. The sum of the forces acting on the car has to equal the mass x acceleration. The reason the normal force is 0 because gravity is exactly equal to the mass x acceleration. There can be no other force acting.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
5K