I want to see the peak for an explosive detector simulation in MCNP

  • Thread starter Thread starter kg09889
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using a 14MeV neutron generator to detect explosives by analyzing prompt gamma rays emitted from carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. The user is struggling to identify energy peaks at 4.43MeV, 5.11MeV, and 6.13MeV due to inadequate visibility, even after applying 2cm thick lead shielding. Suggestions for improving detection methods and understanding neutron-based techniques for explosive detection are sought. A reference to a source on security theory and practice is provided for further reading. The conversation highlights the challenges and complexities of simulating explosive detection in MCNP.
kg09889
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
I put some background radiation to make it more realistic, but I can't see the peak.
I'm trying to find explosives using a 14MeV neutron generator. The main energies I'll see are 4.43MeV of carbon, 5.11MeV of nitrogen, and 6.13MeV of oxygen. These are all prompt gamma rays that come from reacting with fast neutrons. I've tried shielding with 2cm thick lead to see the peak of this energy, but I can't see it very well... What should I do? I share the code and geometry I made.
Please help me...

스크린샷 2025-04-04 003825.png
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thread 'Creating the geometry using MNCPX VisEd'
I'm working on the MSFR design and want to calculate keff. I'm trying to use the MNCPX VisEd program included with MCNP 6.1 to create my geometry. The reactor I'm designing doesn't contain fuel rods or moderator structures. The molten salt fuel circulates within the cylindrical reactor core. I'm having problems creating the geometry using MNCPX VisEd. VisEd allows for easy drawing of nested sphere, cylinder, or rectangular prism cells. However, when you want to draw a torus section within...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K