I with Radial Acceleration -it is an easy one

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the centripetal (radial) acceleration of an airplane's propeller, given a rotation period of T=3 milliseconds and a linear speed of 3000 m/s at the top. The user initially calculated the radius using the formula s=vt, resulting in a distance of 9 meters, which was then used to find the acceleration with a formula a=v²/r. The correct centripetal acceleration was ultimately identified as 6284916 m/s², after correcting a decimal place error in the calculations. The importance of showing previous work for clarity and assistance was emphasized throughout the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal acceleration formulas
  • Basic knowledge of rotational motion
  • Familiarity with linear speed calculations
  • Ability to perform unit conversions and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal acceleration formulas
  • Learn about the physics of rotational motion in airplanes
  • Explore the implications of order of magnitude errors in calculations
  • Investigate the relationship between linear speed and radius in circular motion
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rotational motion in aircraft propellers.

loom
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The period of the rotation of an airplanes ellipse is T=3 milliseconds,linear speed in the top is 3*10^3 m/s.What's the centripetal(radial) acceleration of the top?I need a step by step guide it would be really helpful.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work?
 
If I knew what an 'airplane ellipse' is, I could probably help you.
 
Sorry I meant an airplanes propeller.
 
As physicsvalk kindly stated, show your previous working or attempts, we're here to help, not do it for you.
 
Ok I did it.

v=3000 m/s
T=0.003s

v=s/t 3000m/s = s / 0.003s s=vt s=3000m/s * 0.003s s=9m

s=2piR 9m=2*3.14*R r=9m/6.28 r=1.432m

a=v^2/r a=(3000m/s)^2 / 1.432m = 6.284916m/s^2
 
Yep, you got the same answer as I did. Your working is a little difficult to follow though.
 
Woops, no wait. Its wrong, because I made the same mistake you did. Its an order of magnitude mistake. (The numbers are right, but the decimal place is wrong).

Maybe try again? I think you will get it right second time, since it is only the decimal place that is wrong, you must have been close, but maybe made a silly error?
 
In fact, I think it is just on the last line where you went wrong.
 
  • #10
yes it should have been 6284916m/s^2.Thanks to all for helping
 
  • #11
yep, no worries
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K