Why Use Angular Acceleration Instead of Radial?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a Ferris wheel's motion, specifically focusing on the apparent weight of a passenger at the lowest point of the ride. The subject area includes concepts of circular motion, acceleration, and forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the apparent weight using radial acceleration but encounters confusion regarding the use of angular acceleration instead. Participants discuss the correct application of formulas and the importance of using the radius in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the calculations and confirm the original poster's method as valid. There is acknowledgment of a potential mistake in the calculation process, specifically regarding the use of diameter versus radius.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the choice between radial and angular acceleration in their calculations. There is a focus on ensuring correct values are used in the formulas.

DaveTan
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The cosmoclock 21 Ferris Wheel in Yokohama City, Japan, has a diameter of 100m. Its name comes from its 60 arms, each of which can function as a second hand (so it makes one revolution every 60.0s).

a) Find the speed of the passengers when the Ferris wheel is rotating at this rate [No problem]
b) A passenger weighs 882N at the weight-guessing booth on the ground. What is his apparent weight at the lowest point of the ferris wheel?

Homework Equations


d = vt
arad = v^2.r
w = mg

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no problem with part a.

distance = 2pi r = 314.1m
velocity = 314.1/60 = 5.235m/s

It is part b where I get confused. I get it right till the step to use acceleration. I use radial acceleration and get it wrong, googled the question and someone used angular acceleration. I used his angular acceleration value and my answer was correct. But I am wondering why use angular acceleration instead of radial?

Weight on ground = 882N
Mass = 89.9 kg

F = ma
Nb - mg = ma
Nb = m (a +g)

*This is the part where I use radial acceleration
a = v2/r
a = 0.1745m/s2

Nb = 89.9 (0.1745+9.81)
Nb = 897.6N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, welcome to physicsforums :)
the equation you are using a=v2/r is the correct one. And your value for the velocity is good. I think you made a mistake in doing the calculation v2/r. what values did you use? Remember you should be using radius, not diameter.
 
Hey Bruce! Haha you are right! Opps! Thank you!
 
no worries! glad to help :) Your method was good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
3K