IBDP Extended Essay Ideas -- Help please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a first-year IB student's challenges in selecting a topic for their Extended Essay, specifically focusing on two potential research questions: the effect of gas bubble size on rise velocity in fluids and a simulation of time dilation using a "light clock." The student expresses difficulty in controlling bubble size due to limited school equipment and notes the need for a verifiable equation for their research. Suggestions include using an eyedropper to calibrate bubble sizes and emphasizing the importance of choosing a manageable topic that aligns with the student's interests and available resources. The conversation highlights the balance between ambition and feasibility in project selection.
mmmmmmmm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Don't know what to do for ibdp extended essay topic
Relevant Equations
.
Hey, I'm a first year IB student (G11) starting my extended essay. It's a 4000 word essay where you explore something outside the IB syllabus, and basically write a research project on it. I'm struggling thinking of a topic for my research question.

Right now I've got the research question "How does the size of a gas bubble affect its rise velocity in a fluid with varying viscosity?" where I use newtonian fluids (water) and non newtonian fluids (syrup or honey) to investigate the speed of different sized bubble rising. But the problem for this RQ is that I don't know how to control the size of the bubbles (syringe? blow with straw?) as school equipment are limited.

And another problem is that for the extended essay it's better to have a equation or constant you verify and I don't have that either. My second idea was something on special relativity, as I really liked time dilation and I just think it's so cool!!! So for this one I was thinking of creating a simulation of the "light clock" with a laser pointer, instructions shown below.

"Light Clock" Simulation with a Laser Pointer

  • What It Shows: The fundamental principle behind time dilation using a light clock analogy.
  • How to Simulate:
    • Create a "light clock" by bouncing a laser pointer off two mirrors.
    • Move the mirrors horizontally while shining the laser.
    • Record the apparent change in the light's path due to motion and discuss how this models relativistic time dilation.
  • Materials: Laser pointer, mirrors, ruler, and stopwatch.
What do you guys think? Thanks!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
My general advice for students who are facing experimental projects such as yours is "Don't bite off more than you can chew." On one hand the project must be something that interests you otherwise the result might be a half-hearted crappy job that will leave you unsatisfied. On the other hand it must be something that you can do, with what you know, where you are in the time that you have. Only you can gauge that, therefore you need to do some planning before that. If you see experimental limitations, try to be inventive and overcome them. If you lack an equation to verify, do some research and see if it exists and if not, try to derive it. If you cannot derive it, plot the dependent variable ##y## vs. the dependent variable ##x## and see if you can deduce the functional dependence ##y=f(x)## from the plot. Then see if you can find an justification for that equation in terms of physical principles that you know and understand.

Of the projects that you have selected, the light clock seems to be unrealistic. You have not explained how you plan to use the stopwatch, but if you plan to start and stop it by hand while light is traveling from A to B, you need to consider that human reaction time is of order of 0.1 s. In that time, light travels 10,000 km. If you plan to use something other than light to simulate, as you say, the light clock not that any simulation with anything other than light traveling between A and B might be inappropriate because only light travels at the same speed in all frames of reference.
mmmmmmmm said:
But the problem for this RQ is that I don't know how to control the size of the bubbles (syringe? blow with straw?) as school equipment are limited. And another problem is that for the extended essay it's better to have a equation or constant you verify and I don't have that either.
The bubble project seems to be more realistic. If controlling the size of the bubble is a problem, be inventive with what you have. Here is what I would try if I were you. I would use an eyedropper (they are cheap) and calibrate it. This means fill it with water, squeeze out some of the water on the pan of an scale that can measure small masses (your school must own one or two). I would figure out the volume of the water from its mass. I would mark the air-water interface on the eyedropper. I would repeat with the now marked eyedropper to verify that the squozen water indeed has the volume that I think it does. Repeating this many times will give you an estimate of the experimental uncertainty in the size of the bubble. For a different volume, I would not get greedy and try to put more marks on the eyedropper. I would use a second eyedropper. Like I said, be inventive.
 
kuruman said:
squozen water
And today I learned a new word! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top