Ice Cap Meltdown -> Land Upheaval -> Earthquakes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimensionless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential geological impacts of the melting Antarctic ice cap, specifically focusing on isostatic uplift and its possible effects on tectonic activity, including earthquakes and volcanism. Participants explore the historical context of ice cap melting and its relationship with volcanic activity and land upheaval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention isostatic uplift/rebound as a phenomenon occurring in areas previously covered by ice, suggesting it could influence tectonic plates and potentially lead to earthquakes.
  • There is a suggestion that while isostatic uplift may increase the likelihood of earthquakes, it is less likely to induce volcanism in areas that have not previously experienced it.
  • Historical data from ice core samples indicate periods of increased volcanic activity during glacial transitions, but participants express uncertainty regarding the causation between ice melting and volcanic activity.
  • Some participants argue that certain volcanic regions, such as the Volcan Eifel and Massif Central, may show correlations with glacial cycles, but the direct effects of ice melting on these areas remain debated.
  • There is a discussion about the geographical extent of past ice sheets and their relationship to current volcanic activity, with some participants questioning the direct impact of isostatic rebound on volcanism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between ice cap melting, land upheaval, and volcanic activity. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding causation and the effects of isostatic rebound.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the available data, including the coarse dating of volcanic activity and the dependence on specific geographical contexts. The discussion highlights unresolved questions about the interactions between glacial history and tectonic processes.

dimensionless
Messages
461
Reaction score
1
I've read that if and when the Antarctic icecap melts off, the land will rise up due to having a very massive amount of ice melt off. This sounds like it could effect the tectonic plates and the bedrock. Is this land upheaval apt to cause Earth quakes and maybe even volcanism?
 
Last edited:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
It's called isostatic uplift/rebound, and it's still happening (albeit slowly) in areas that were covered by ice a few thousand years ago. The UK for instance.
Looks like it can promote earthquakes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-glacial_rebound#State_of_Stress_and_Intraplate_Earthquakes

I'd bet that in an area where volcanism already exists, it may increase its likelihood, but it's not really likely to generate any melt and cause volcanism where there was none before.
 
matthyaouw said:
It's called isostatic uplift/rebound, and it's still happening (albeit slowly) in areas that were covered by ice a few thousand years ago. The UK for instance.
Looks like it can promote earthquakes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-glacial_rebound#State_of_Stress_and_Intraplate_Earthquakes

I'd bet that in an area where volcanism already exists, it may increase its likelihood, but it's not really likely to generate any melt and cause volcanism where there was none before.

If you check out this ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/greenland/summit/gisp2/chem/volcano.txt from the GISP-II ice core you will find unusual high volcanic activity during the last glacial transition, for instance about 10-11,000 years ago, around 12,700 years ago, 13,600 years ago, 15,000-17,000 years ago, etc,etc versus virtually none in prolongued periods. But I'm not sure about the causation, what is cause and what is effect?
 
Andre said:
If you check out this ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/greenland/summit/gisp2/chem/volcano.txt from the GISP-II ice core you will find unusual high volcanic activity during the last glacial transition, for instance about 10-11,000 years ago, around 12,700 years ago, 13,600 years ago, 15,000-17,000 years ago, etc,etc versus virtually none in prolongued periods. But I'm not sure about the causation, what is cause and what is effect?

Interesting. None of the volcanic areas I can think of were under ice sheets at any point (except kamchatka perhaps?). It's hard to imagine the increased volcanism being a direct effect.
 
matthyaouw said:
Interesting. None of the volcanic areas I can think of were under ice sheets at any point (except kamchatka perhaps?). It's hard to imagine the increased volcanism being a direct effect.

Not in Kamchatka, there was no ice sheet over there. The maximum extent of the Eurasian Weichselian ice sheet during the last glacial maximum (as posted earlier, source Hubberten et al 2004):

11uzx1w.jpg


Known areas with higher volcanic activity were the Volcan Eifel in Germany and the Massif Central in France

I do note that the mentioned active phases in the Volcan Eifel seem to be co dated with the up spikes of the 100,000 years seesaw cycle:

http://www.awi.de/typo3temp/pics/91b26f7eef.jpg

versus:

Rieden volcanic complex -- 380,000 to 430,000 years old in the WEVF. It consists of plagioclase-free fallout, flow deposits, and scoria cones in various compositional types (leucite-phonolite, nephelinite, leucitite).

Southeastern sector of EEVF -- around 215,000 to 225,000 years old. Basaltic (basanite and tephrite) scoria cones.

Niedermendiger lava flow -- between 100,000 to 150,000 years old. Major basaltic (tephrite) lava flow along with lesser alkalic (phonolite) eruptions in the EEVF.

Laacher See eruption -- about 13,000 years ago. Major eruption of alkalic (phonolite) tephra and pumice at the Laacher See volcano in the EEVF. Volume of erupted magma was approximately 5 km³, which equals or exceeds all mafic eruptions in the WEFV.

All perhaps roughly in the upspikes of the interglacials? But these dates are very coarse, but worth to narrow it down and see if there is a real correlation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
29K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
19K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
26K