Greenland ice cap may be melting at triple speed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Greenland ice cap is melting at an alarming rate, with recent studies indicating a loss occurring five times faster in the southeastern region compared to previous measurements. This data, published in the journal Science, is part of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission, which provides comprehensive monthly estimates of ice-mass balance. The findings suggest that Greenland's melting ice contributes approximately 0.56 millimeters annually to global sea level rise, with significant implications for ocean circulation and climate patterns, particularly in Western Europe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of glaciology and ice mass balance
  • Familiarity with satellite radar interferometry techniques
  • Knowledge of ocean currents, specifically the North Atlantic Current
  • Basic principles of climate change and its global impacts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the GRACE mission and its methodologies for measuring ice mass loss
  • Study the effects of freshwater influx on ocean currents and climate
  • Examine the implications of glacial melting on global sea levels
  • Explore satellite radar interferometry and its applications in geoscience
USEFUL FOR

Climate scientists, environmental researchers, oceanographers, and policymakers focused on climate change and its effects on global sea levels and weather patterns.

Mk
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
4
http://www.utexas.edu/opa/news/2006/08/engineering10.html
The loss of ice has been occurring about five times faster from Greenland’s southeastern region in the past two years than in the previous year and a half. The dramatic changes were documented during a University of Texas at Austin study of Greenland’s mass between 2002 and 2005.

The study was published today in the journal Science. Related results on the significant loss of ice from Antarctica were published in Science in March by other researchers participating in the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission. The GRACE mission is funded by NASA and the German Aerospace Center, and led by Aerospace Engineering Professor Byron Tapley at the university.

“Our latest GRACE findings are the most complete measurement of ice mass loss for Greenland,” said Tapley, director of the university’s Center for Space Research (CSR) and holder of the Clare Cockrell Williams Centennial Chair in Engineering. “The sobering thing to see is that the whole process of glacial melting is stepping up much more rapidly than before.”

Antarctica is considered the largest, and Greenland the second largest, reservoir of fresh water on Earth, with the latter containing about 10 percent of the world’s fresh water. Melting of ice from these two regions is expected to impact sea level and ocean circulation, and potentially the future of climates worldwide.

The Greenland study, for example, suggests that the amount of fresh water contributed from the melting of its ice sheet could add 0.56 millimeters annually to a global increase in sea levels, higher than all previously published measurements.

“These findings are consistent with the most recent independent measurements of Greenland’s mass done by other techniques like satellite radar interferometry, but in this case they provide a direct measure of ice-mass changes,” said Geology Professor Clark Wilson, a co-author on the latest Science article who helped analyze the estimates for Greenland. Wilson chairs the Department of Geological Sciences at the university and holds the Wallace E. Pratt Professorship in Geophysics.

Within the subpolar zone that includes Greenland, the rapid rise in meltwater along its eastern coast could add to other warming-related factors believed to be weakening the counterclockwise flow of the North Atlantic Current. For instance, the increased meltwater could change how more buoyant fresh water mixes with salt water in a branch of this flow called the Norwegian Current. This change could lower the temperatures of water, and thus wind, that travels past the west coast of Ireland and Great Britain.

That ocean temperature change would occur because the current might not move northward past Norway before returning to more southerly latitudes. Warmer, southerly waters would be stalled from moving northward if that happened, resulting in chillier winters in parts of Western Europe.

“If enough fresh water enters the Norwegian Current,” Tapley said, “and you interrupt return flow, then there could be climate effects in Europe.”

The twin GRACE satellites provide the most comprehensive monthly estimates of Greenland’s ice-mass balance. The satellites are sensitive to the gravitational pull of mass changes on Earth, which produce micrometer-scale variations in the distance (137 miles or 220 kilometers) that separates the two satellites as they fly in formation over Earth.

Lead author Jianli Chen, a CSR research scientist, developed a method to improve the effective spatial resolution of mass change estimates. The method used the known locations of major glaciers as information in estimating the sources of mass change.

“By using this special filtering procedure,” Chen said, “we teased out additional details of mass changes in Greenland along its Southeastern and Northeastern shores separately.”

The estimates showed that 69 percent of the ice-mass loss in recent years came from eastern Greenland. Of the 57 cubic miles (239 cubic kilometers) of water mass lost on average each year, 39 cubic miles (164 cubic kilometers) were from the eastern shoreline. More than half of that eastern loss involved ice from the glacier complex in southeast Greenland.
''Science (DOI:10.1126/science.1129007)''
http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn9717/dn9717-1_464.jpg
I like this one. Well, I like maps. I found it interesting in Northern Canada readings show +5.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Here's a good one also for sea level rise:http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib.jpg
 
The link doesn't work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
17K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K