Ideals in R: Exploring the Meaning of 2 in (a-b)(a-b) = a^2 -2ab+b^2 = 1"

  • Thread starter Thread starter futurebird
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the expression (a-b)(a-b) = a^2 - 2ab + b^2 within the context of ideals in a commutative ring R. It establishes that if a and b are elements of ideals A and B respectively, and a - b = 1, the expression holds true only if R is commutative. The number 2 in the term 2ab is significant as it denotes the additive identity in the context of ring theory, particularly when R contains a homomorphic copy of the integers. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between commutative and noncommutative rings in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ideals in ring theory
  • Knowledge of commutative and noncommutative rings
  • Familiarity with polynomial expansion and algebraic identities
  • Basic concepts of homomorphisms in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ideals in commutative rings
  • Explore the implications of noncommutative rings on algebraic identities
  • Learn about homomorphic images and their significance in ring theory
  • Investigate the role of integers in the structure of rings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those focusing on ring theory and ideals.

futurebird
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Lets say that we know that for [tex]a \in A[/tex] and [tex]b \in B[/tex] where A and B are
ideals of R, [tex]a - b = 1[/tex]. Do we then know that [tex](a-b)(a-b) = a^2 -2ab+b^2<br /> = 1[/tex]? In that case, what is the meaning of the number 2 in the term 2ab? We
don't know that 2 is in R, R could be anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, if R really is "anything" (in particular, if it's noncommutative), then (a-b)(a-b) is not equal to a^2-2ab+b^2 - it's equal to a^2-ab-ba+b^2.

Second, if R contains 1, then R contains 1+1, and 1+1+1, and so on. The positive number n used used to denote these. The negative number -n is used to denote their additive inverses, i.e. -(1+1), -(1+1+1), and so on. 0 of course denotes 0. In this way every unital ring contains a homomorphic (warning: not isomorphic) copy of the integers.
 
morphism said:
First of all, if R really is "anything" (in particular, if it's noncommutative), then (a-b)(a-b) is not equal to a^2-2ab+b^2 - it's equal to a^2-ab-ba+b^2.

I should have said that R is a commutative ring with identity in this context.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K