If a and b divide n prove or disprove that a.b divides n.

  • Thread starter Thread starter gottfried
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical statement: if positive integers a and b divide n, whether a.b also divides n. The proof presented suggests that if a.b does not divide n, it leads to a contradiction, indicating that a.b must divide n under certain conditions. Specifically, the proof holds true if a and b are relatively prime or if both are divisors of n that are less than the square root of n. The counterexamples provided illustrate that the product of two divisors can exceed n, thus not necessarily dividing it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integer divisibility
  • Familiarity with concepts of greatest common divisor (GCD)
  • Knowledge of least common multiple (LCM)
  • Basic proof techniques in number theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of GCD and LCM in relation to divisibility
  • Explore proofs involving divisors and their products
  • Investigate the implications of the square root in divisibility conditions
  • Learn about relative primality and its effects on divisibility
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of divisibility among integers.

gottfried
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a and b divide n prove or disprove that a.b divides n.[a,b,n are positive intergers]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose a.b does not divide n.
Then \frac{n}{a.b}=I [I must not be a postitive interger]
\frac{n}{a.b}=\frac{1}{a}.\frac{n}{b} since a divides n it follows that n=a.x where x is a positive interger.

Therefore\frac{x}{b}=I
This implies that the quotient of two positive intergers cannot be an interger and this is a contradiction.

I have a feeling this proof is not sufficient since it is a only a contradiction in certain cases where b divides x. If anybody could tell me if this proof is sufficient and/or give me a better one that would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of a number with a lot of divisors, say 12 :

Divisors are : 2,3,4,6, 12...

Can you spot an issue with the products?
 
Is it that the products can be more than the original number 12 and therefore clearly don't divide 12.
 
Right. 4|12, and 6|12 , but (4)(6)=24. Your statement, (I think) , would be true,if

you restricted yourself to divisors of n smaller than Sqr(n) , the square root of n.
 
That does makes sense that would work and I also think it would work if the a and b were relative primes such that (a,b)=1.
 
You're right, 6|300 and 15|300, but 90 does not. This is also a counter to the

original of a different type--since 90<300 ,so that it could in theory divide it.

Maybe this counterargument would also work:

If a|n and b|n implied ab|n without qualification,then we could extend this to :

a|n and ab|n would imply a(ab)|n . Then a(ab)|n and b|n would imply a(ab)b|n ,...
 
however, if the G.C.D of a and b is 1, then ab does divide n.
In general, the L.C.M of a and b does divide n by definition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K