JG89
- 724
- 1
If a function f is differentiable at a point x = c of its domain, then must it also be differentiable in some neighborhood of x = c?
The discussion revolves around the differentiability of functions at a point and the implications of differentiability in a neighborhood of that point. Participants explore whether a function that is differentiable at a point must also be differentiable in some neighborhood around that point, considering various examples and definitions related to continuity and differentiability.
Participants generally disagree on whether differentiability at a point implies differentiability in a neighborhood. Multiple competing views remain, with some supporting the idea and others providing counterexamples.
Limitations include the dependence on definitions of continuity and differentiability, as well as unresolved mathematical steps regarding the implications of differentiability in neighborhoods.
continuous at x=0? Isn't it necessary for a function to be continuous at a point c for it to be derivable at c?<br /> f(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{lr}x^2&x\in\mathbb{Q}\\-x^2&x\not\in\mathbb{Q}\end{array}<br />
BobbyBear said:And what does it mean to be continuous at a point?
I don't think so. Take any continuous function f differentiable at c and any continuous, nowhere differentiable function g bounded in some neighbourhood of 0 (such as the Weierstrass function). Then f(x) + (x-c)*g(x-c) should be continuous, differentiable at c, but not differentiable on any neighbourhood of c.Cantab Morgan said:Good catch, slider142! Okay, for fun let's emend the question a bit...
Given an function that is continuous in some neighborhood of c and differentiable at c, must it also be differentiable in some neighborhood of c?
Continuity at a point only means that nearby points approach a, not that it's continuous near a.