If a system is made of 3 atoms with no degeneracy with energy levels

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the determination of microstates in a system composed of three distinguishable atoms with specific energy levels (0, e, 2e). Participants explore the implications of distinguishability and the definitions of microstates versus configurations in both classical and quantum mechanics contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the system has only three microstates, arguing that classical mechanics allows for 6 configurations due to distinguishable particles, while quantum mechanics leads to only 1 configuration but maintains three microstates.
  • Another participant counters that there are actually 27 microstates (3^3) because each atom can occupy one of three states independently, challenging the previous explanation regarding indistinguishability and configurations.
  • The second participant emphasizes that the context of energy levels typically refers to electronic states, and the treatment of indistinguishability depends on whether the atoms are Bosons or Fermions.
  • Concerns are raised about the misleading nature of the first explanation regarding indistinguishability and the counting of states, suggesting that permuting atoms does not yield new states in certain contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the number of microstates, with one asserting three microstates and another claiming 27. The discussion remains unresolved as both viewpoints are presented without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of definitions regarding distinguishability and the nature of the states being considered, indicating that assumptions about the system's context may affect the conclusions drawn.

iontail
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
if a system is made of 3 atoms with no degeneracy with energy levels of fro example 0, e, 2e

would it be safe to say that the system only has three microstate or will it be 2^3 microstates.

if it is 2^3 can you please explain why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's 3 microstates. and won't be 8 anyway, it may be 6 "configurations" not microstates as follows:

classical mechanics says that it's 6=3x2x1 different configurations, because the particles would be distinguishable, like if you have 3 numbered balls in 3 different boxes, and you want to count how many configurations are possible.

Quantum mechanics says that particles like electrons are not distinguishable, therefore you have less configurations by N!, and so you only have 1 possible configuration, and yet three microstates. This gives the rise to Gibbs paradox, you can find something about that in Wikipedia.

I hope I answered your question.

good luck :)
 


thankyou veryy much
 


Welcome :)
 


iontail said:
if a system is made of 3 atoms with no degeneracy with energy levels of fro example 0, e, 2e

would it be safe to say that the system only has three microstate or will it be 2^3 microstates.

if it is 2^3 can you please explain why?


Each atom can be in three states. To specify the state of the three atom system means telling in which of the three state each individual atom is, so there are 3^3 = 27 microstates for the three atom system.

TheDestroyer's explanation is wrong and on the indistinguishability issue he is misleading, because if we talk about atoms that can be in certain energy level, we are usually talking about a system in which the atoms are in some position and the energy level refers to the electronic states only.

If you have a system in which you have three atoms in a box and the state refers to the complete quantum state that includes the translational motion, then depending on whether the atoms are Bosons or Fermions, can they be in the same state or not. Also, permuting te atoms does not yield a new state. But for system in which you have 3 atoms in 3 posible states, you can't divide by factorial 3 to take that into account, as you can easily see by writing down all the states.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K