If all of spacetime was created with the Big Bang...

  • I
  • Thread starter rumborak
  • Start date
  • #1
706
154
...why do people like Stephen Hawking talk about things/events "before" the Big Bang? If time (as part of spacetime) was created with this event, it also marks the point in time that had no "before", doesn't it?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,721
5,702
It's believed that the big bang singularity, which is what leads people to say that spacetime was "created" in the big bang, is simply an artifact of our incomplete knowledge of physics at the extreme energy and density scales of the very early universe. It's a bit like predicting that the EM force becomes infinite as you approach the center of an atom. Before the advent of quantum physics we had no idea why the force did not become infinite, even though our theories predicted it would. Now we know better. Same for the big bang. That's why physicists like to talk about things that happened before the big bang. They know that our theories and models are likely incorrect and are continuing the search for better and more accurate theories.
 
  • #3
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
27,196
5,906
That's why physicists like to talk about things that happened before the big bang.
Caveat - only Physicists who know what they're talking about. Common clods like you and me need to be very careful about that. :smile:
 
  • #4
37,733
15,474
why do people like Stephen Hawking talk about things/events "before" the Big Bang?

Because they're using the term "Big Bang" properly, to refer, not to an "initial singularity" in idealized models that we know don't correctly describe the very, very early universe, but to the hot, dense, rapidly expanding state that is the earliest state of the universe for which we have good evidence. We don't know for sure what preceded that state, but the current best hypothesis is that it was preceded by an era of inflation.
 
  • #5
706
154
Well ... but doesn't that usage imply the assumption that normal physics prevailed during that process, i.e. that spacetime was "intact" enough to give a notion of a "before"? It's probably a good assumption ("barring contrary evidence, assume everything stays the same"), but at the same time the event is so outside of normal physics operation that it's not (I would think).
 
  • #6
18
4
What would you call the "time" before space-time?
 
  • #7
37,733
15,474
doesn't that usage imply the assumption that normal physics prevailed during that process, i.e. that spacetime was "intact" enough to give a notion of a "before"?

If you mean, is there spacetime "before" the Big Bang when that term is used properly, yes, there is. As I said, we don't know for sure what occupies the spacetime before the Big Bang, but our best current hypothesis is that it was an era of inflation.
 
  • #9
706
154
There is no such thing.

Disregarding the Big Bang event for a moment, I find that topic incredibly interesting from a standpoint of causality. At least to me, causality implies the requirement of time. So, if it is nonsensical to ask "what was before spacetime", then isn't nonsensical to ask "what casued/created spacetime"?
(Totally aware that I am straddling philosophical/religious considerations here, I just find the thought that millenia of questioning might eventually be answered by "it's a stupid/nonsensical question", somewhat amusing)
 

Related Threads on If all of spacetime was created with the Big Bang...

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
762
  • Last Post
Replies
28
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
750
  • Last Post
3
Replies
83
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
24K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
38
Views
10K
Top