If electromagnetic waves propagate, do photons as well?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of electromagnetic (EM) waves and photons, specifically whether photons propagate in the same way as EM waves do. Participants explore concepts from classical physics and quantum mechanics, examining the implications of wave propagation and the existence of photons in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that while EM waves propagate, photons do not propagate but rather "pop up" at specific locations when an interaction occurs.
  • Others argue that the concept of propagation may not apply to photons in the same way it does to classical waves, suggesting that the quantum mechanical framework does not provide clarity on the behavior of photons when not observed.
  • A participant notes that photons are special states of the electromagnetic field and emphasizes that understanding them requires mathematical formalism rather than classical particle analogies.
  • There is a suggestion that the electromagnetic field is a fundamental entity in classical theory, and quantizing it leads to probabilistic interpretations regarding interactions and measurements.
  • One participant questions whether the classical notion of motion and identity of particles exists in quantum mechanics or quantum field theory (QFT).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether photons propagate, with some asserting they do not, while others maintain that EM waves propagate and photons result from interactions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of photons and their relationship to propagation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the classical understanding of photons and the need for mathematical descriptions in quantum mechanics. There is also mention of the ambiguity surrounding the behavior of particles when not observed, which complicates the discussion of propagation.

calinvass
Messages
159
Reaction score
5
In classical physics, EM waves propagate this is one of the main features of all waves in general. Usually for mechanical waves the elements (like molecules) that vibrate do some little motion. For example a string can move up and down, but the waves travel further through propagation. The information or a signal carried by these waves travels by propagation. For EM waves there is not even vibration (mechanical) of the elements involved but only a variation of E and B fields. For these waves there seem to be absolutely no physical motion involved. What about the quantum mechanical photons? Is there any physical motion involved?
Because if photons propagate and not move then I suppose it is likely that all particles do that. Does the motion we know from classical physics where an object keeps its identity exist in QM or QFT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
calinvass said:
In classical physics, EM waves propagate this is one of the main features of all waves in general. Usually for mechanical waves the elements (like molecules) that vibrate do some little motion. For example a string can move up and down, but the waves travel further through propagation. The information or a signal carried by these waves travels by propagation. For EM waves there is not even vibration (mechanical) of the elements involved but only a variation of E and B fields. For these waves there seem to be absolutely no physical motion involved. What about the quantum mechanical photons? Is there any physical motion involved?
Because if photons propagate and not move then I suppose it is likely that all particles do that. Does the motion we know from classical physics where an object keeps its identity exist in QM or QFT?
Photons don't propagate at all. EM waves propagate and if they encounter something a photon can be the result of that interaction.
 
phinds said:
Photons don't propagate at all. EM waves propagate and if they encounter something a photon can be the result of that interaction.

From that I understand the waves propagate and the photons simply pop-up (where they are observed for example) at fixed locations , but they don't propagate of travel. Is that correct?
 
calinvass said:
From that I understand the waves propagate and the photons simply pop-up (where they are observed for example) at fixed locations , but they don't propagate of travel. Is that correct?
Yes, although "pop up where they are observed" is a bit casual. They come into existence when an EM wave excites something (like an atom)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: calinvass
calinvass said:
What about the quantum mechanical photons? Is there any physical motion involved?

In QM what's going on when not observed the theory is silent on. So the idea of propagation, which implies something going on regardless of observation, is not applicable.

Thanks
Bill
 
phinds said:
Photons don't propagate at all. EM waves propagate and if they encounter something a photon can be the result of that interaction.

What about the other particles (leptons and quarks)?
 
phinds said:
Photons don't propagate at all. EM waves propagate and if they encounter something a photon can be the result of that interaction.
?
 
First of all in classical theory the electromagnetic field to our present understanding is a fundamental entity. You cannot describe it by more fundamental other entities. It is defined operationally by its action on charged bodies.

Now when quantizing it, what's provided by the theory as by any quantum theory are probabilities to have a certain "reaction", i.e., a scattering cross section. A photon is a special state of the electromagnetic field, namely a socalled single-photon Fock state. Photons are very difficult to explain in plain English. There's no way out: To really understand photons you need some mathematics. In any case you must not think about photons as something like a classical particle. This picture even more wrong than for massive quanta like electrons, protons, etc. E.g., one can prove from the formalism of relativistic QFT that a photon has no observable you could call "position of the photon". The only thing you can say, given the single-photon state at its preparation, is the probability to register it with some photodetector at a given place and a given time. In this sense the "electromagnetic field propagates" in the same sense as any other quantum system propagates, i.e., given the initial state you can calculate the probabilities for measuring an observable on this system at any time (provided you know the dynamics of the system with sufficient accuracy and are able to solve the equations of motion).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: calinvass, bhobba, dextercioby and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K