If light approaches a black hole will it accelerate?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of light in the context of black holes and gravity. Participants clarify that light, despite being massless, possesses momentum and energy, which allows it to be affected by gravity through the curvature of spacetime as described by General Relativity (GR). Newtonian gravity is deemed insufficient for explaining light's interaction with gravity, as it fails to account for the effects of spacetime curvature. Ultimately, light does not accelerate towards a black hole but can gain energy, resulting in a blueshift as it falls into the gravitational well.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of spacetime curvature
  • Knowledge of light's properties, including momentum and energy
  • Basic grasp of Newtonian gravity limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of light cones and their behavior near black holes
  • Study the implications of Einstein's theory on the deflection of light
  • Explore the relationship between energy, momentum, and mass in physics
  • Examine the differences between Newtonian gravity and General Relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astronomy enthusiasts, and students of theoretical physics seeking to deepen their understanding of light's interaction with gravity and the implications of General Relativity.

hayden47
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If light approaches a black hole will it accelerate? I think this question ties in with whether light has mass or not. Does light have mass? It seems accepted that light has momentum, but this is not consistent with saying that photons are mass-less (momentum=mass*volume). Could someone clear this up or is it actually a contradiction? Mass is a requirement for gravity also. I've always heard that not even light can escape a black hole which is gravitational force, so wouldn't a black hole have enough force to accelerate light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hayden47 said:
Does light have mass? It seems accepted that light has momentum, but this is not consistent with saying that photons are mass-less (momentum=mass*volume).
Photons are massless. The relationship between energy, momentum, and mass is ##m^2 c^2=E^2/c^2-p^2##. For photons ##p=E/c## so the mass is 0 despite having both energy and momentum.
 
Oh I see. I'm still confused then of how gravity can affect light if it does not have mass (such as a black holes' effect on light).
 
Why should that matter?

First, Newtonian gravity is experimentally known to be wrong wrt the effect of gravity on light.

Second, in GR gravity curves spacetime and spacetime clearly affects light.

Third, even if you ignore the previous two points it takes 0 force to accelerate something without mass, so the fact that the Newtonian force is 0 doesn't imply that the acceleration is 0.
 
DaleSpam said:
First, Newtonian gravity is experimentally known to be wrong wrt the effect of gravity on light.

Second, in GR gravity curves spacetime and spacetime clearly affects light./QUOTE]The whole idea of Newtonian gravity is that gravity is the force that causes the attraction of masses and is caused by mass. Of course this would not work with light if it is massless. So perhaps it is accidentally correct when dealing with two masses.

GR gravity IS the curve of spacetime right? So if that is what is affecting the light and everything else, then I'm asking will a bend in spacetime as great as a black hole cause light accelerate?Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
 
Light does not accelerate. It always moves at c in a vacuum. It will, however, gain energy by falling into the gravity well and be blueshifted.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
hayden47 said:
I've always heard that not even light can escape a black hole which is gravitational force, so wouldn't a black hole have enough force to accelerate light?

If you are imagining that the light that can't escape the BH is traveling away from the BH and being slowed down or stopped by the BH's gravitational acceleration... and therefore supposing that the reverse would be that the BH can accelerate light moving close or toward the BH, then maybe this line of thinking may be causing the problem.

Look for something about light cones, and how they change "orientation" around a BH.

Here is an example - http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/schwarzschild.html

The light that can't escape the BH does not have a radial direction component away from the BH in its future light cone... the light cones can be oriented so that their "outer" edge is tangent to the event horizon.

(I've probably butched this description, but I think it is the concept needed here).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Acceleration is a change in velocity. Velocity is a measurement of direction and speed. The website you pointed me to says "The Einstein Theory correctly predicted the amount of the deflection of starlight". Is this acceleration?
 
hayden47 said:
Acceleration is a change in velocity. Velocity is a measurement of direction and speed. The website you pointed me to says "The Einstein Theory correctly predicted the amount of the deflection of starlight". Is this acceleration?

No. As Drakkith said, light always travels at exactly c in a vacuum. It also always travels in a "straight line", BUT ... a "straight line" in a high gravity field is a "straight line in spacetime" and that is not quite what you normally mean by "straight line". The deflected path IS a "straight line in spacetime", which in more formal parlance is called a "geodesic".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
hayden47 said:
The whole idea of Newtonian gravity is that gravity is the force that causes the attraction of masses and is caused by mass
And how much force does it take to accelerate a massless object. What does Newtons 2nd law say?
hayden47 said:
Of course this would not work with light if it is massless.
Sure it would. Plug 0 in for the mass, what is the gravitational force? How does that compare to your answer above?

Newtonian gravity gives the wrong behavior for light, but not because of it being massless.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
917
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K