High School How far outward can we rule out intelligent life?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alltimegreat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the detection of extraterrestrial intelligent life (ETI) and the limitations imposed by current technology. Participants agree that if a civilization with technology similar to ours exists within 100 light years, we would likely have detected their radio signals, particularly through omnidirectional broadcasts. The conversation references the Fermi Paradox, suggesting that the rarity of intelligent life or the limitations of radio communication technology could explain the absence of detected signals. The observable universe's vastness, estimated at 90 billion light years in diameter, further complicates the search for ETI.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fermi Paradox
  • Knowledge of radio communication technology and its limitations
  • Familiarity with the concept of light years and astronomical distances
  • Basic grasp of the observable universe's scale
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Fermi Paradox on the search for extraterrestrial life
  • Study the capabilities of the Square Kilometer Array for detecting radio signals
  • Examine the limitations of radio communication in interstellar contexts
  • Explore recent studies on the probability of detecting signals from alien civilizations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, science fiction enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and the technological challenges involved.

  • #91
I just disovered today the term "radio bubble," which extends 110 LY from the Earth in all directions. This bubble around the Earth contains 15,000 stars.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #92
write4u said:
I see no major conflict in our position. I was addressing a special ability (flight)practised by insects 10-15 million years ahead of the appearance of birds. Watch the Robert Hazen lecture, which I linked in previous posts. I see no major conflict in our position. Robert Hazen proposes that biochemicals are abundant in the universe and that the Earth is not a special planet, but that it requires only an average rocky planet with oxygen and water to eventually (inevitably) produce bio-chemistry and the beginning of bio-molecules, which then evolved into complex bio-organisms. The exact times are not important, all that matters is that complex bio-molecules almost inevitably will form, given enough time and under the right conditions.

My point is, average "enough time" for appearance of differentiated multicellular life may be very large. Say, much larger than current age of the Universe. It's possible that we are a very unlikely statistical fluke.

"Something is bound to eventually happen" does not equal practically meaningful probability above zero. Example: a neutrino can scatter off other particles via gravitational interaction. But its probability is so astoundingly tiny that even if human civilization will spend the rest of eternity (until heat death of the Universe) trying to detect such an event, it will never be seen.
 
  • #93
Alltimegreat1 said:
Let's assume there is a planet out there with life equally intelligent as humans that is putting in the exact same amount of effort to detect alien life that we are. Their science and technology also developed in line with human technology. Given that we're looking and they're looking, what is the closest this planet could be to us given that we don't know about them (yet)? Any guesses?
One overlooked question is could intelligent life evolve on planets that are unsuitable for us? If it transpires that only Earth type planets can evolve intelligent life then there maybe only a few of these per galaxy hence the quietness
 
Last edited:
  • #94
Dr Barkus said:
One overlooked question is could intelligent life evolve on planets that are unsuitable for us? If it transpires that only Earth type planets can evolve intelligent life then there maybe only a few of these per galaxy hence the quietness
intelligent life can certainly evolve on planets that are unsuitable to humans. Intelligent life has evolved on Earth in environments that are totally unsuitable to humans, so why not elsewhere?
 
  • #95
I think the timeframes we're looking at here are SO NARROW.. we've had technology for what.. 100 years?.. Perhaps in another few hundred years we'll have wiped ourselves out.. If that is a pattern that happens on other planets that could or have had intelligent life, the timeframe is so small there's a good chance we'd never witness it, even if we were looking in the right place.

And the definition of intelligent life seems a little narrowminded in itself.. Perhaps if we defined it as radio-capable intelligent life it would be more accurate. For billions of years we've had intelligent life on earth, though it never broadcasted any radio signals.
For the Fermi paradox.. I think we ought to worry more about what perils we're setting ourselves up for at our own hand than the slight chance that an alien will pick up our signals and come destroy us... Yes, it makes for (debateably) good sci-fi movies, but trivializes what we're doing ourselves
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
12K