IGBT Maximum Ratings and Protection Considerations in SMPS Designs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robertphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Igbt Max
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the maximum ratings and protection considerations for IGBTs in switch-mode power supply (SMPS) designs. Participants explore the behavior of IGBTs under sudden load conditions, particularly in scenarios where the secondary side of the transformer is shorted, and the implications of energy storage in capacitors on device failure.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that IGBTs rated for 600V and 100-150A can fail under sudden load conditions, questioning why this occurs despite their high ratings.
  • Another participant asks about the cleanliness of the gate-emitter voltage (VGE) signal, suggesting that noise or insufficient voltage could affect performance.
  • A participant calculates that a capacitor bank of 4000 microfarads could deliver significant current (180A) for several milliseconds, potentially exceeding the IGBT's ratings.
  • Concerns are raised about the thermal management of IGBTs, with references to datasheet specifications regarding power dissipation and junction temperature limits.
  • It is mentioned that standard fuses may not respond quickly enough to protect IGBTs from high current pulses, implying that IGBTs themselves may act as a form of protection.
  • Questions are posed regarding the driving circuit of the IGBT and its potential impact on performance during voltage sag conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the causes of IGBT failure under load, with some attributing it to energy storage in capacitors and others to thermal issues or gate drive conditions. There is no consensus on the primary cause of failure.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific IGBT models and their datasheets, indicating that the discussion is grounded in technical specifications. However, there are unresolved assumptions regarding the circuit design and component interactions that may affect performance.

Who May Find This Useful

Engineers and designers working with IGBTs in power electronics, particularly those involved in SMPS design and thermal management.

Robertphysics
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
I’ve been wondering about the capabilities of IGBT and Mosfets in general , I recently had a few problems with an smps and here is what I wonder , for example the IGBT used in the supply has an absolute maximum rating of 600v and 120 amps at room temp, I can’t recall the exact IGBT in question but I have seen this with other ones too so let me just put for example FGH60N60SF or FGY75N60SMD or other devices , now I have seen they blow whne there is a sudden very large load on the secondary of the smps transformer and in other cases , but let’s take the secondary shorted case as our example.

My mains voltage is 230v and the socket delivers about 16-20 amps max then the voltage would probably start to sag. So simple maths gives us about 325v DC rectified. It’s a half bridge topology , prior to the switching transistors there are 4x1000uF capacitor bank , now if there manages to be a short at the secondary side the transistors blow up or short out.

My question is why is this so since their ratings are so high , 600v max voltage and 100 to 150 amps of collector current , in such case I was hoping for my 5amp mains fuses to simply blow out and the whole thing would settle easily since the secondary current translates back to the primary side but instead the transistor blow.

Could it really be that the 4x1000uF cap bank stores enough energy to be capable of giving more than 100 amps of current for a long enough moment to exceed the quite large rating of the transistors , or is this because the rather small to 247 and other devices simply get too hot too fast under such load and fail primarily due to heat?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Engineering news on Phys.org
Robertphysics said:
My question is why is this so since their ratings are so high , 600v max voltage and 100 to 150 amps of collector current
Are you sure that the VGE voltage is a completely clean square wave witout any noise and ≥ 12Vdc ( on ) ?

( even when the transformer is short circuited ).
 
Robertphysics said:
Could it really be that the 4x1000uF cap bank stores enough energy to be capable of giving more than 100 amps of current for a long enough moment to exceed the quite large rating of the transistors , or is this because the rather small to 247 and other devices simply get too hot too fast under such load and fail primarily due to heat?

yes to both questions.

Datasheets are your friend.

https://www.fairchildsemi.com/datasheets/FG/FGH60N60SF.pdf


FGH60N60SF _datasheet.jpg
If 4000 microfarads are delivering 180 amps, what is the rate of voltage decrease ? dv/dt = I / C
Now 180 amps / 4000 microfarads = 45 volts per millisecond ,
so if starting from 300 volts your capacitors could deliver a 180 amp pulse that persists for several milliseconds.
They might well deliver more than 180 amps, the max for that device.

Now to Hesch's question,
FGH60N60SF _datasheet2.jpg

Vce goes way up and that drives power dissipated in the device sky high

Now to your second question, heating of that package: (see datasheet clip above)
At 40 degC per watt junction to ambient and maybe ambient of 30C, with no heatsink your device can only handle three watts continuous and still hold junction below 150C.
If you put it on a heatsink that can hold the case to 30C, it should handle 120/.33 = 363 watts. Do you see how they got 378 with case at 25?

Are yours on big heatsinks?

old jim
 
Also - standard fuses are not fast enough to protect semiconductors - so you can definatly send way too big of a current pulse with this set up. The IGBT is the "faster" fuse. Also - how is the IGBT being driven? If the driver circuit also see the sag, it may drop the gate voltage, increasing the Vf in the IGBT - sending the losses through the roof. Does the the driver have DeSat and some form of Over-current protection?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K