I'm confused by this concept 2-d motion dumb question

  • #1

Homework Statement


A cart that is rolling at constant velocity on a level table fires a ball straight up. When the ball comes back down, will it land in front of the launching tube, behind the launching tube, or directly in the tube? Explain.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


Why does it land right back into the cart. That is super counterintuitive for me. I feel like the only forces on it if we don't include air friction is gravity. Therefore shouldn't it land behind the cart?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,281
8,684

Homework Statement


A cart that is rolling at constant velocity on a level table fires a ball straight up. When the ball comes back down, will it land in front of the launching tube, behind the launching tube, or directly in the tube? Explain.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


Why does it land right back into the cart. That is super counterintuitive for me. I feel like the only forces on it if we don't include air friction is gravity. Therefore shouldn't it land behind the cart?
Suppose you are standing in the aisle of an airplane that is moving at 600mph and you jump up a couple of feet in the air. Where do you think you would come down? Why?
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander and billy_joule
  • #3
Suppose you are standing in the aisle of an airplane that is moving at 600mph and you jump up a couple of feet in the air. Where do you think you would come down? Why?
In the same place. O this is without air friction right
 
  • #4
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,541
2,309
The problem statement does not say if you should or shouldn't ignore air resistance. I would give answers for both cases.
 
  • #5
kuruman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
10,828
3,849
In phinds' plane example, the air moves with the plane and there is no horizontal motion relative to the air to affect the landing spot when someone jumps straight up. In the demonstration below, there is horizontal motion relative to the air but the ball still lands in the cart. Therefore, air resistance can be safely ignored because the experiment says so.

 
  • #6
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,281
8,684
In the same place.
Right[/quote]O this is without air friction right[/QUOTE]well, do YOU think there is any air friction in that example?
In phinds' plane example, the air moves with the plane and there is no horizontal motion relative to the air to affect the landing spot when someone jumps straight up. In the demonstration below, there is horizontal motion relative to the air but the ball still lands in the cart. Therefore, air resistance can be safely ignored because the experiment says so.
Well, no, THIS experiment actually does NOT show that. If you look carefully you'll see that the ball lands an inch or two behind the hole from which it was released. Since it is a light plastic ball, the obvious inference is that this is (unintentionally) a demonstration of how air resistance DOES make a difference in some cases. He should have used a steel ball bearing for a better demonstration since that would have been far less affected by air resistance.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on I'm confused by this concept 2-d motion dumb question

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
859
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Top