I'm nothing without my calculator....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the challenges faced by a participant transitioning from a civil engineering program that allowed programmable calculators to a graduate engineering physics program that does not. The participant expresses difficulty in performing manual calculations, particularly in calculus, and seeks advice on whether it is feasible to quickly improve their skills in this area while studying advanced topics such as Lagrangians and Hamiltonians.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) feels reliant on calculators and questions their ability to grasp necessary mathematical concepts without them.
  • Some participants suggest that the OP's current school may not be a good fit due to its rigid policies on calculator use.
  • One participant shares their experience of having supportive professors who focused on the application of engineering principles rather than the minutiae of calculus.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of being able to differentiate and integrate by hand, suggesting that these are fundamental skills that should be developed.
  • The OP acknowledges their struggles with more complex calculus problems and mentions dropping a class to focus on preparing for future coursework in quantum mechanics.
  • There is a recognition that while basic calculus skills may be manageable, deeper problems present significant challenges for the OP.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the OP's situation, with some suggesting that reliance on calculators has hindered their skills, while others highlight the importance of supportive educational environments. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for the OP to improve their mathematical skills.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the OP's previous educational experience may have led to gaps in manual calculation skills, and there is an acknowledgment of the difference between understanding concepts and executing calculations efficiently. The discussion does not resolve the specific challenges faced by the OP in adapting to their new program.

Who May Find This Useful

Students transitioning between engineering programs, particularly those facing challenges with manual calculations in advanced mathematics, may find this discussion relevant.

FarFromPhD
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So i graduated with good gpa in a civil engineering program in a school in Québec. Problem is, at that said school, programmable calculators were allowed and we abused it. Every single integrals or derivatives or complex number manipulation was solved by it and now i transferred to another graduate school in a engineering physics master program (course based) and they don't allow any form of programmable calculators. I'm currently studying lagragians and hamiltonians in before quantum mechanics and quantum optics for microfabrication (photoelectrochemical cells and stuff). But i simply cannot do anything without my calculator.

Simply put, is it possible to rapidly grasp the maths for those topics or am i doomed to an undergraduate career in civil engineering... I been practicing for about 2-3 additional hours a day for 3 weeks now and I'm not even near where i want to be with hand derivatives and integrals.

Anyone here who wasn't good at manually solving problems and picked it up for grad schools?

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like the school just isn't a good fit. As an undergraduate, I remember having a couple of professors who were extremely authoritarian. Many years later, I look back and conclude these professors (who are likely now very old) took themselves a little too seriously. It is somewhat difficult to change schools=much time and effort are spent applying and getting admitted to a program as well as getting the funding, but this one sounds like a poor fit for you. It is likely they are very set in their ways and aren't going to try to make their program help meet your needs. ..editing...One thing you should look for in both academia and engineering employment is a place that can help make it an adventure for you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FarFromPhD
FarFromPhD said:
So i graduated with good gpa in a civil engineering program in a school in Québec. Problem is, at that said school, programmable calculators were allowed and we abused it. Every single integrals or derivatives or complex number manipulation was solved by it and now i transferred to another graduate school in a engineering physics master program (course based) and they don't allow any form of programmable calculators. I'm currently studying lagragians and hamiltonians in before quantum mechanics and quantum optics for microfabrication (photoelectrochemical cells and stuff). But i simply cannot do anything without my calculator.

Simply put, is it possible to rapidly grasp the maths for those topics or am i doomed to an undergraduate career in civil engineering... I been practicing for about 2-3 additional hours a day for 3 weeks now and I'm not even near where i want to be with hand derivatives and integrals.

Anyone here who wasn't good at manually solving problems and picked it up for grad schools?

Thanks a lot.

I was in a similar situation. However I was lucky enough to have my graduate professors recognize that the goals of the exams is to test knowledge and application of engineering principals, not the subtleties of trig substitution. On exams the actual calculus wasn't that difficult, but the application was.

What degree of difficulty are the problems? Are you saying you can find the derivative of 2X+7^X? or are you concerned that you can find the integral of X^(e^(sinx)+7log(x)). If you can't do the first one by hand in a short amount of time you should work on your calc skills. If you can find the second one by hand in a short amount of time good for you, but it belongs on a calc exam, not a strength of materials exam.

note: both the problems and the class are made up for illustration :)

I recommend talking to your professor. In the real world people use computers. Depending on the difficulty of what you are being asked to do there may be exceptions. Have you had an exam yet?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FarFromPhD
If you can't differentiate by hand, that's a serious problem. There's nothing difficult about differentiation. Integration is harder, but at this point, you should be able to do any of the integrals in an intro calculus book by hand. That's just basic knowledge you should have under your belt. Since you presumably learned this stuff before, it probably won't take you too long to relearn it.

Of course, there's a difference between knowing how to solve a problem, and being able to solve it quickly and efficiently. You typically develop the skills to do mathematical calculations efficiently with practice. Your unfortunate reliance on a calculator to bypass all that practice has left you at a disadvantage; you just have to put in the time to catch up to where you should have been.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FarFromPhD
Thanks for the answers guys i really appreciate it. Yeah i can do the basic expressions but i struggle when it get deeper like d(e^sin(3x)+13x^3)/cosh(4x))dx . Anyway, i dropped a class to have a smooth session so i can get into the problems of my next semester quantum mechanics class. (They use the Griffiths book which is pretty well detailed so I am just going to work out the problems and practice the required maths). And if i still can't cope with it then after a whole semester of study i think I'm just going to call it and find a job in civil engineering...

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
814
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K