I'm practicing how to differentiate equations.

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter silvashadow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiate
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around differentiating an equation related to the volume of soda in a truncated cone-shaped cup as it fills over time. Participants explore the relationship between volume, height, and radius, and how these variables change with respect to time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Peter H. presents an equation for the volume of a soda cup and seeks help with differentiating it with respect to time.
  • Some participants question the assumptions about the variables, particularly whether the height or radii are changing with time.
  • Peter H. clarifies that the cup has a constant base radius and a varying top radius as soda fills it, leading to a need for a relationship between height and radius.
  • One participant suggests that the volume can be expressed as a function of time, proposing that volume is directly proportional to time based on the flow rate of soda.
  • Another participant discusses the complexity of differentiating the volume equation due to the interdependence of height and radius, suggesting that a better substitution is needed to simplify the differentiation process.
  • A later reply proposes a geometric approach to visualize the problem, involving the relationship between the dimensions of the truncated cone and the volume of the water inside it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct approach to differentiate the volume equation and whether the assumptions made about the variables are valid. There is no consensus on a single method or solution, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem due to the changing dimensions of the cup as it fills, which complicates the differentiation process. There are also concerns about the assumptions made regarding the relationship between height and radius over time.

silvashadow
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
I'm practicing how to differentiate equations.

I need help differentiation this: http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/531/voloz4.jpg

I made that equation up from a soda cup, different size bases. Is this equation correct?

I tried to differentiate with respect to time. I get http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/9403/diffcb7.jpg .
Does that look right?

Thanks for any help.

Peter H.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you please post the original question? The first link you have is an equation for the Volume, only variables being the height and radii - ie The volume is constant with time. The original question may have said the height or radii were changing with time though, so please tell us.
 
Here's the question that I made up:

Soda is being filled into a soda cup. The cup is 6 inches tall and has a diameter of 3.5 inches at the opening. The diameter is 2.5 inches at the base of the cup. The flow rate of the soda fountain is 8.47 in^3/s. Find the rate of change in height of the soda at the top of the cup.

Cup I have looks like this: http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/272/1drs4622gz4.jpg

Ignoring flow rate, I first need an equation for V. That's what I found. Then I need dV/dt to solve for dh/dt.
r1 is the radii of base, r2 is radii of top of liquid, which is top of cup. dr1/dt is 0 b/c r1 is constant. dr2/dt is not constant.

Peter H.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now,

[tex] \frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{8.47}{3} = 2.82[/tex]

Note however, that this is an 'averaged' rate of flow meaning, we are assuming that if [itex]x[/itex] liters flows in 1 second, [itex]2x[/itex] liters shall flow in 2 seconds i.e. [itex]V = kt[/itex].. i.e. Volume is directly proportional to time.. which i guess holds quite true for most real life situations, particularly a pumped soda fountain.

At a time 't', some soda will be filled in the cup. That soda will constitute a frustum. Let the radius of this frustum be [itex]x[/itex]. Let the height at that time be [itex]h[/itex] and the total height be [itex]H[/itex]. The base radius will still be [itex]r_1[/itex]. Since we have assumed linear proportionality between Volume and time, the volume at that time 't' would be: [itex]V = 2.82t[/itex].

Also, volume is equal to:

[tex] V = \left (\frac{1}{2} \left (r_1 + r_2 \right ) \right )^2 \pi h[/tex]

which is:

[tex] 2.82t = \left (\frac{1}{2} \left (r_1 + r_2 \right ) \right )^2 \pi h[/tex]

Let's call this equation (II).

In this we have two variables [[itex]x[/itex] and [itex]h[/itex]] which change w.r.t time. Hence, it would be quite complicated if we just solving this. The Key Idea here is that, for a particular height [itex]h[/itex], we have a particular radius of the frustum, [itex]x[/itex]. This basically means that we can relate these two quantities.

The relation is:

[tex] x = \frac{h(r_2 - r_1)}{H} + r_1[/tex]

Please see the attached image for how I came to this relation. Now substitute this value of 'x' in the equation (II) and differentiate both sides w.r.t. time to get [itex]\frac{dh}{dt}[/itex].

I may have made a silly mistake in here.. because it seems like dh/dt will be constant.. which is a bit strange.. but since i haven't really calculated it.. it might be dependent on time.. but nevertheless.. this should give you an idea on how to solve these kinds of questions..
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.jpg
    Untitled-1.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 443
oops.. i calculated a few stuff.. and found out that my method is sorta... wrong. It's not wrong as in.. it would give you the correct answer... but it's going to be too much calculation. It is because when you first differentiate w.r.t time, you get dh/dt in terms of 'h', which again will change w.r.t time. So, to get dh/dt purely in terms of 't', we need to make a better substitution in the beginning, or as in the current case.. we'll have to substitute a relation between h and t.. which is quite tedious.

so.. hang on till someone wiser replies.. i'll try to think of something.. and post if i come up with anything :D
 
Here's what I would do. The cup is a "truncated" cone so draw a picture of it "seen from the side": draw a triangle having vertex at the origin of a coordinate system, base of length r2 parallel to the x-axis. Essentially, you have two symmetric lines through the origin. You want the line on the right to pass through (0,0), [itex](r_1/2,\lambda)[/itex] (the base of the cup), and [itex](r_2/2,\lambda+ H)[/itex] (the top of the cup). The equation of any line passing throug (0,0) and [itex](r_1/2, \lambda)[/itex] must be and the equation of any line passing through (0,0) and [itex](r_2/2,\lambda+ H)[/itex] must be [itex]y= ((\lambda+ H)/r_2)x[/itex]. For a line passing through all 3 of those points, we must have [itex]\lambda/r_1= ((\lambda+ H)/r_2[/itex]. From that we get that [itex]\lambda= Hr_1/(r_2- r_1)[/itex]. That is, the equation of the line is y= The water in the cup must conform to the sides of the cup and so must be a truncated cone have lower base with radius [itex]r_1/2[/itex], height h, and upper base radius given by [itex]h= (\lambda/r_1)r_1= (Hr_1^2/(r_2- r_1))[/itex].

The volume of a cone of height h and base radius r is [itex](1/3)\pi r^2h[/itex] and the volume of the water is the difference of the volumes of the two cones: [itex](1/3)\pi [(Hr_1^2/(r_2- r_1))]^2(h+ Hr_1^2/(r_2-r_1)[/itex] and [itex](1/3)\pi r_1^2 (h+ Hr_1^2/(r_2-r_1)[/itex]. Subtract those and differentiate with respect to h.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K