I'm slightly confused about the power spectrum of matter

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Power Spectrum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the matter power spectrum scalings, specifically how \( P_{\Delta}(k) \) behaves in different regimes. For super horizon modes where \( k < k_{\mathrm{eq}} \), the scaling is \( P_{\Delta}(k) \sim k \), while for sub horizon modes where \( k > k_{\mathrm{eq}} \), it scales as \( P_{\Delta}(k) \sim k^{-3} \). The analysis utilizes the Mészáros equation and the Poisson equation, leading to the conclusion that the perturbations evolve with log growth during the radiation era and quadratic growth in the matter era, ultimately confirming the scalings of \( P_{\Delta} \) at early and late times.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Mészáros equation in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the Poisson equation in the context of cosmological perturbations
  • Knowledge of scale invariance and its implications for perturbations
  • Basic concepts of matter-radiation equality and horizon crossing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Mészáros equation in detail to understand its implications for cosmological perturbations
  • Learn about the Poisson equation and its application in cosmology
  • Explore the concept of scale invariance in perturbation theory
  • Investigate the dynamics of matter-radiation equality and its effects on the power spectrum
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, astrophysicists, and researchers in theoretical physics who are analyzing the evolution of the matter power spectrum and its implications for structure formation in the universe.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
How do you get these scalings for the matter power spectrum?$$P_{\Delta}(k) \sim \begin{cases} k & \quad k < k_{\mathrm{eq}} \\ k^{-3} & \quad k >k_{\mathrm{eq}} \end{cases}$$(N.B. ##k_{\mathrm{eq}}## is the scale of modes that enter the horizon ##k \sim \mathcal{H}## at matter-radiation equality. So the first scaling is for comfortably super horizon modes and the second is for comfortably sub horizon modes).

Take the sub horizon case, i.e. modes where ##k \gg k_{\mathrm{eq}}##, as an example. From the Mészáros equation we know that for these modes we have ##\Delta_m \sim \log a## in radiation domination (early times) and ##\Delta_m \sim a## in matter domination (late times). How do I use this to deduce that ##P_{\Delta}(k) \sim k^{-3}##?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I've gotten an answer back -- on super horizon scales we know that ##\delta \sim \phi \sim \mathcal{R}##, and scale invariance of perturbations in ##\mathcal{R}## constrains ##P_{\mathcal{R}} \sim k^{n_s - 4}##, so by the Poisson equation:
$$\Delta \sim (k/\mathcal{H})^2 \phi_k \implies P_{\Delta} \big{|}_{\tau = \tau_i} \sim k^4 \tau_i^4 P_{\Phi} \sim k^{n_s}$$at some initial time ##\tau_i##. The perturbations evolve as ##\sim \tau^2## up until horizon crossing, so you have something like$$P_{\Delta} \sim (\tau/\tau_i)^4 P_{\Delta} \big{|}_{\tau = \tau_i} \sim k^{n_s}$$At horizon crossing, but still in radiation era, you have log growth, followed by ##\tau^2## growth again in the matter era. So the result is you pick up two more "transfer" factors:

$$P_{\Delta} = \left(\frac{\tau}{\tau_i}\right)^4 \left( 1 + \log{\frac{\tau_{eq}}{\tau_{cross}}} \right)^2 \left( \frac{\tau_{cross}}{\tau_i} \right)^4 P_{\Delta} \big{|}_{\tau = \tau_i} \sim (\log{k})^2 k^{n_s - 4}$$since at horizon crossing ##k \sim \mathcal{H} \sim \tau^{-1}## (so ##\tau_{cross} \sim k^{-1}##)

So taking ##n_s \approx 1##, you reproduce approximately the scalings ##P_{\Delta} \sim k## at early times and ##P_{\Delta} \sim k^{-3}## at late times.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K