Why does power spectrum is calculated at the radiation/matter epochs?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The power spectrum in cosmology is calculated during the radiation and matter-dominated epochs due to the specific equation of state, $P=\omega \rho$. This evaluation is crucial as it relates to the physical scale of perturbations reentering the Hubble horizon, allowing these perturbations to be treated as classical fields. The early universe's composition, primarily normal matter and radiation, is constrained by Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, which confirms that dark energy had minimal influence during these epochs. The differing energy density scaling of matter, radiation, and dark energy further supports this framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the equation of state in cosmology ($P=\omega \rho$)
  • Familiarity with the concepts of radiation and matter-dominated universes
  • Knowledge of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and its implications
  • Basic principles of Hubble's law and cosmic expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis on cosmic composition
  • Explore the role of dark energy in the universe's expansion
  • Learn about the dynamics of perturbations in cosmological models
  • Investigate the scaling laws of energy density for different cosmological components
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the early universe, cosmic microwave background studies, and the dynamics of cosmic expansion.

chronnox
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
In the standard inflationary scenario, the power spectrum is evaluated at the cosmological time when one assumes an equation of state $ P= \omega \rho$ , that is, one is assuming a particular radiation or matter dominated universe. Why does it has to be in these cosmological epochs? does it involve something about the physical scale of the perturbations reentering the Hubble horizon and then one treats the perturbations as classical fields?.
 
Space news on Phys.org
chronnox said:
In the standard inflationary scenario, the power spectrum is evaluated at the cosmological time when one assumes an equation of state $ P= \omega \rho$ , that is, one is assuming a particular radiation or matter dominated universe. Why does it has to be in these cosmological epochs? does it involve something about the physical scale of the perturbations reentering the Hubble horizon and then one treats the perturbations as classical fields?.
The primary constraint on the contents of the very early universe stems from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, where if the universe had different contents, the relative ratios of the primordial light elements would have been different. Because of this, we can be quite confident that at and before the emission of the cosmic microwave background, our universe was almost entirely dominated by normal matter (including dark matter) and radiation: dark energy played little to no role during that epoch.

The reason why it works out this way is that the energy density of the different components of the universe scales differently with the expansion. Normal matter drops off with the cube of the scale factor: you're just diluting out the matter. Radiation drops off with the fourth power of the scale factor: not only are you diluting the number density of photons, but you're also redshifting them. Dark energy, by contrast, doesn't dilute much (if at all) as the universe expands, and it's this feature which makes it cause the expansion to accelerate.

What this means is that as time goes on, dark energy's contribution to the total energy density grows compared to matter and radiation: in the distant past, both matter and radiation were far more dense, but dark energy wasn't. And so the early expansion of the universe can be reproduced extremely accurately by just considering normal matter and radiation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K