I'm stuck Not sure where to go. Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cowtipper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a two-mass system involving friction. The setup includes a 10 kg mass (m1) on a table connected to a 4 kg hanging mass (m2) with specified coefficients of static and kinetic friction. The user initially misinterpreted the problem as involving a frictionless surface but later corrected it. The correct formula for acceleration is derived, leading to an answer of approximately 0.70 m/s², with emphasis on proper unit usage and significant figures. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting problem statements in physics.
Cowtipper
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object with a mass of 10 kg (this mass is m1) rests on a horizontal table and is connected to a cable that passes over a pulley and is then fastened to a hanging object with mass of 4.0 kg (this mass is m2). The coefficient
of static friction between m1 and the horizontal surface
is 0.50, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.30. If the system is set in motion with m2 moving
downward, what will be the acceleration of the system?

Homework Equations


m1 = mass one
m2 = mass two
T = tension
μ = coefficient of friction
g = gravity
a = acceleration
R = normal reaction

I got this helpful hint at another site, but I still can't figure it out...

For m2:
m2 g - T = m2 a ...(1)

Resolving horizontally and vertically for m1:
T - μR = m1 a ...(2)
R = m1 g ...(3)

Substitute for R from (3) in (2):
T - μm1 g = m1 a ...(4)

Add (1) & (4):
(m2 - μm1)g = (m1 + m2)a
a = (m2 - μm1)g / (m1 + m2)
= (4 - 0.3 * 10)g / (10 + 4)
= g / 14
= 0.701 m/s.



The Attempt at a Solution



And this is where I run into the problem. I'm not sure what to do, even with the helpful hint provided on another site.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You initially stated that m1 rests on a frictionless surface, then you give coefficients of static and kinetic friction for m1 and the surface. How is this so?
 
Oops, that was my mistake. I've edited the problem - it isn't frictionless. I'm very sorry about that...
 
Don't sweat it, I just wasn't sure what the problem was trying to accomplish. I'm not sure what you're having trouble on, you've already arrived at the correct answer. The only problem is your units and sig figs. It should be .70 m/s^2.
 
Oh, okay. Thanks a for the assistance.
 
\ W_2 - F_f = (m_1+ m_2) \cdot a eq (1)

\ N = m_1 \cdot g eq (2)

\ F_f = \mu \cdot N eq (3)

\ F_f = \mu \cdot m_1 \cdot g eq (4) from (2) into (3)

\ W_2 = m_2 \cdot g eq (5)

\ m_2 \cdot g - \mu \cdot m_1 \cdot g = (m_1+ m_2) \cdot a

\frac{\((m2 - \mu \cdot m1)} {\((m2 +m1)} g = 0.701
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top