Undergrad Images of elements in a group homomorphism

Click For Summary
The image of elements in a group homomorphism primarily depends on the image of the identity element, 1, because it simplifies calculations. The homomorphism property allows for the expression of any element as a multiple of 1, making it straightforward to compute images. Specifically, the calculation shows that for any integer a, the image can be expressed as a times the image of 1. While other generators could also be used, 1 is favored for its simplicity. This highlights the fundamental role of the identity element in group homomorphisms.
Terrell
Messages
316
Reaction score
26
Why does the image of elements in a homomorphism depend on the image of 1? Why not the other generators?
homomorphisms.png
 

Attachments

  • homomorphisms.png
    homomorphisms.png
    20 KB · Views: 840
Physics news on Phys.org
Other generators would work as well, but ##1## is especially easy to handle:
$$\varphi(a)=\varphi(a\cdot 1)=\varphi (\underbrace{1+\ldots +1}_{a\text{ times }})=\underbrace{\varphi(1)+\ldots +\varphi(1)}_{a\text{ times }}=a\cdot \varphi(1)$$
Now convince me with such a calculation by the use of ##\varphi(7)##.
 
  • Like
Likes Terrell
fresh_42 said:
Other generators would work as well, but ##1## is especially easy to handle:
$$\varphi(a)=\varphi(a\cdot 1)=\varphi (\underbrace{1+\ldots +1}_{a\text{ times }})=\underbrace{\varphi(1)+\ldots +\varphi(1)}_{a\text{ times }}=a\cdot \varphi(1)$$
Now convince me with such a calculation by the use of ##\varphi(7)##.
I was not sure it was out of pure convenience. Thanks!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
862
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
512
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
828