Imaginary Time and Path Integrals?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
364
Reaction score
35
Steven Hawking writes in A Brief History of Time that time itself must sometimes have an imaginary component in order for Feynman's Sum-Over-Histories approach to work. Why, in a nutshell, is this so? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is wick rotation, please google "wick rotation",
you also can find wick rotation in Wiki