Impact and collision - having problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter overpower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Impact
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the oblique collision of two identical smooth spheres, focusing on the angles of impact and rebound, as well as the coefficient of restitution. The original poster seeks to prove a specific relationship involving the tangent of the rebound angle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the geometry of the collision, questioning the placement and meaning of the angles involved. Some suggest drawing diagrams to clarify the situation, while others explore the implications of the coefficient of restitution on the angles and velocities after impact.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Participants are questioning assumptions about the angles and the role of the coefficient of restitution, while some express uncertainty about the original poster's proposed relationship.

Contextual Notes

There is ambiguity regarding the reference points for the angles, and participants note the need for clarity on how the coefficient of restitution influences the angles involved in the collision. The original poster's question and proposed solution are also under scrutiny.

overpower
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Impact and collision -- having problems

A smooth sphere A impinges obliquely with an identical smooth sphere B which is at rest. the direction of A before and after impact makes angles 60 and X , respectively, with the line of centres at impact. the coefficient of restitution is e.
prove that tan x=2(root)3/1-e
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
That is a good question - how have you been attempting it?
Have you sketched out the geometry yet?
 
this is the problem i just don't quite understand the Q,im not sure where the 60 and X is
 
Draw two circles, representng the spheres, on a bit of paper, so that they touch.
These are the spheres in the moment of contact.
Label one A and the other B.

Draw a dotted line through the centers of the circles - this is the reference line for the angles.

Draw lines through each center to represent the trajectory before the contact ... remember that the collision is oblique, as opposed to head on. A is the only one moving... it's trajectory makes an angle of 60deg to the reference line. There are 4 ways you can get a 60degree angle in there but at most two will make much sense, and it does not matter which of those you pick.

Similarly for the trajectories after the impact.
 
ok thanks for your time
 
No worries - let us know how you got on.
 
overpower said:
prove that tan x=2(root)3/1-e
Simon Bridge said:
Draw a dotted line through the centers of the circles ...
Draw lines through each center to represent the trajectory before the contact ..
Similarly for the trajectories after the impact.
Seems overpower's gone. I'm interested in the problem, if I am allowed,

first of all :
- is the solution \frac{2\sqrt{3}}{1-e}; if it is an elastic collision then: \frac{2\sqrt{3}}{0}?
- m1= m2?
If we consider the x-axis the direction of A and the two balls at the origin at -60°, if the balls have equal mass then the direction of X should be +30° with reference the x-axis and 90° with the line of impact, right?
tan 30° = 1/√3
 
Last edited:
The question is a tad ambiguous because it is not clear what the angles are with respect to.
I suppose you could proceed by having the initial velocity of A to be at 60deg to the line joining the centers of A and B at the point of impact.

You should show your working and reasoning along with your solution.
i.e. Why would X be 90deg to the line of impact?
Have a play with some billiard balls and see what happens (air-hockey pucks would be better)
 
Simon Bridge said:
Why would X be 90deg to the line of impact?
In this regard the OP is not ambiguous.
As the balls are identical the scattering angle X must always be roughly at 90° from the line of impact,because the ball at rest B will always move a 0°
What I do not know is if or how the coefficient e affects the angle X, does it?.
But anyway the solution in OP seems wrong to me,
what does 2√3 mean? and
what 2√3/0? is it a correct representation of tan 90°?
 
  • #10
"with line of the centers of impact" shazbot!
managed to misread that, then read it, then miss it!

The coefficient of restitution affects things by determining the rebound velocity.
Check the definition.
 
  • #11
Simon Bridge said:
"with line of the centers of impact"
The coefficient of restitution affects things by determining the rebound velocity.
I'd appreciate if you give me a lodestar saying that I did not misread also the solution in the OP and that it actually it reads 2√3/1-e.
I interpreted "the line od centers of impact" as the line joining the 2 centers of mass of the balls. Is that wrong?
I do not understand, also, why the coefficient e appears in the value of the tangent of angle X if it affects only velocity
 
  • #12
$$\tan X = \frac{2\sqrt{3}}{1-e}$$ ... is how I read it.

I interpreted "the line od centers of impact" as the line joining the 2 centers of mass of the balls. Is that wrong?
No - I'd say that was correct.

I do not understand, also, why the coefficient e appears in the value of the tangent of angle X if it affects only velocity
You'd have to ask OP.
However the angle X will depend on the direction of the velocity vectors, which will be determined by their magnitudes via conservation of momentum.
 
  • #13
I have the impression you agreed that OP is wrong.
The angle of rebound is always at a right angle when masses are identical.
Tan X is 1/√3, vB is v*cos60, and vA is v*cos30* e, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K