Hey,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

My question is on the Dirac equation, I am having a little confusion with the steps that have been taken to get from this form of the Dirac equation:

[tex]i\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=(-i\underline{\alpha}\cdot \underline{\nabla}+\beta m)\psi[/tex]

to

[tex]-\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial t^2}=[-\alpha^{i}\alpha^{j}\nabla^{i}\nabla^{j}-i(\beta\alpha^{i}+\alpha^{i}\beta)m\nabla^{i}+\beta ^{2}m^{2}]\psi[/tex]

I believe we are imposing the Klein-Gordon (maybe not) on the Dirac Equation to determine the conditions required for a free particle description via the Dirac equation, however I cannot see how this is done from those steps above.

I'm not exactly sure what these mean ∇^i and alpha's^i... We are told we apply the 'operator' to both sides of the top equation - I'm not sure what operator this is - I'm guessing it's the Klein Gordon operator though.

Any help would be appreciated on how to get from equation 1 to equation 2,

Thanks,

SK

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Imposing Klein-Gordon on Dirac Equation

Loading...

Similar Threads - Imposing Klein Gordon | Date |
---|---|

I Negative and Positive energy modes of KG equation | Dec 18, 2017 |

A The Lagrangian Density and Equations of Motion | Sep 28, 2017 |

I Klein-Gordon propagator derivation | Aug 26, 2017 |

I Quantum mechanics shows how the poverty of energy imposes structure...? | Jan 11, 2017 |

Conservation of angular momentum in field theory: imposed, or emergent? | Aug 23, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**