In a finite group G, the inverse of each element is a power of itself.

In summary, the conversation discusses proving that in a finite group G, the inverse of each element is a power of itself. This can be proven by using the Lagrange theorem and showing that the assumption of an element having no power equal to the identity leads to a contradiction. This proof relies on the laws of exponents for groups, which may need to be proven separately.
  • #1
gotmilk04
45
0

Homework Statement


If G is a finite group and g is in G, then there exists a positive integer r with g^r=e.
and in general, prove that, in any finite group G, the inverse of each element is a power of itself.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know if a group is finite then it has a finite order, which means g^n=e, but how do you write that as a proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Be careful: that the order of the group is finite does not automatically mean that g^n = e for some n.

Did you learn about the Lagrange theorem yet?
It says that the order of any element of the group, divides the order of the group. When you apply that you know that in particular, g^n = e for some finite number n and you can write down an explicit inverse for g (which, as you probably know, is unique).
 
  • #3
What about:

Assume on the contrary that there does not exist any [tex]k \in \mathbb{Z}^{+}[/tex] such that, for [tex]g \in G[/tex], [tex]g^{k} = 1_{G}[/tex], the identity. As G is finite, we can't have all [tex]g^{k}[/tex] distinct for all positive integers k, as it would result in a set having infinite cardinality. Thus [tex] \exists k_{1}, k_{2} \in \mathbb{Z}_{+}[/tex] such that [tex]k_{1} \neq k_{2}, g^{k_{1}} = g^{k_{2}}[/tex]. Without loss of generality we may assume that [tex] k_{1} > k_{2}[/tex]. But then [tex]g^{k_{1}}g^{-k_{2}} = g^{k_{2}}g^{-k{2}} \Leftrightarrow g^{k_{1}-k_{2}} = 1_{G}[/tex], and [tex]g_{1}-g_{2} \in \mathbb{Z}^{+}[/tex], which is a contradiction. Thus the assumtion that such an integer k exists must be false, and the assertion is proven.

This is actually pretty much what you stated, but formulated in such a way that it provides a proof. Though, one must be careful. For example, this proof uses the "laws of exponents" for groups, which has to be proven. Though, I suspect you have already done that in your course.
 

1. What is a finite group?

A finite group is a mathematical structure that consists of a set of elements and an operation that combines any two elements to produce a third element. The set must be finite, meaning it has a limited and countable number of elements.

2. What is an inverse element in a group?

An inverse element in a group is an element that, when combined with another element using the group operation, produces the identity element. In other words, it "undoes" the operation and brings the element back to its original state.

3. Why is the inverse of each element in a finite group a power of itself?

This is because every element in a finite group has a finite order, meaning that when an element is multiplied by itself a certain number of times, it eventually becomes the identity element. Therefore, the inverse of an element must be a power of itself in order to produce the identity element when multiplied together.

4. What is the significance of this property in a finite group?

This property is significant because it ensures that every element in a finite group has an inverse, which is necessary for the group to have a well-defined structure and for certain mathematical operations to work. It also allows for the simplification of calculations and proofs in the group.

5. Can this property be applied to infinite groups as well?

No, this property only applies to finite groups. In infinite groups, there may be elements that do not have an inverse or that have inverses that are not powers of themselves. This is because infinite groups have an unlimited number of elements, making it impossible for every element to have a finite order.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
503
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
966
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
962
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top