In class final for a graduate EM class?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the educational value and integrity of in-class final exams in a graduate Electromagnetism (EM) course using Jackson's textbook. Participants reflect on their experiences with exam difficulty, issues of academic dishonesty, and the implications for learning in a small class setting.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the educational value of an in-class final exam, citing the complexity and time-consuming nature of Jackson problems.
  • Another participant shares their experience with final exams that were four hours long and notes that the problems were less difficult than typical Jackson problems.
  • Concerns about cheating are raised, with one participant stating that some students copied solutions verbatim from a posted solution, which they believe is unethical.
  • There is a repeated emphasis on the improbability of getting away with cheating in a small class, as similar work would be easily noticed by the professor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the educational value of the exam format and the implications of cheating. There is no consensus on whether the in-class final is beneficial or detrimental to learning.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific incidents of cheating and the professor's response, which may reflect broader issues of academic integrity in small classes. The discussion does not resolve the educational effectiveness of the exam format or the appropriateness of the professor's grading decisions.

ptabor
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I question the educational value of such an exam. We've been working out of Jackson this year, and based upon my experience the typical jackson problem (just one) takes at least two hours, even if you know what you're doing and make minimal mistakes (ie dropping signs, forgetting terms in your algebra).

The professor hasn't done it before, but this year he caught several students (maybe 3 out of 7) cheating (on problem 5.26 - the prof has yet to work out the quoted solution). No, I was not one of them. I made a completely boneheaded mistake (calculated the integral of B*B between the two wires, as opposed to over all space). Instead of reporting the problem to the dept. chair he simply didn't grade the problem for those students (they got a score out of 30, the rest of us out of 40).

In any event, I'll quit ranting. To get to my original point, for those who have had to take an in class final for Jackson, was this educational for you at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did they cheat?

In fourth year, I took two 1-semester courses that had Jackson as text and assignment source. The final exams were four hours long, and the exam problems were somewhat less difficult than Jackson problems.

I would rate the value of this type of exam as about the same as most exams.
 
from what I understand, they copied from a posted solution, verbatim.

Personally, I think it's one thing to check a solution to see if you're on the right track. But to copy something is wrong.
 
ptabor said:
from what I understand, they copied from a posted solution, verbatim.

Personally, I think it's one thing to check a solution to see if you're on the right track. But to copy something is wrong.
And to think they could get away with it, in a class of seven people? If any two people in a class that small do a hard problem with exactly the same work and with the same writing, it should be pretty obvious that the professor is going to catch it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
552
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K