quantumcarl
- 767
- 0
Originally posted by kyleb
oh no offence taken, i don't really hold offence towards words regardless of their nature; i was just a bit shocked to see it used in such context. however, i am curious as to where this idea of a " secret disciple" stems from. i didn't know Judas's fathers name was Simon but i assumed that Peter was not the only one, yet i also know that many do not realize that Peter's given name was Simon and that is the only disciple by that name i have ever heard of at all so i figured it was just a matter of confusion.
Let me put it this way.
"The Romans adopted Christianity".
That's a bit like the Nazi's telling everyone they've adopted Judeaism.
Now imagine the Koran or whatever the Jewish bible is called... imagine what it would read like after the Nazi's edited it to their taste and to their culture of fear and controlling.
This is what I think has happened to the bible. And people keep referring to it as though it was written yesterday and has never seen the light of a malicious editor's desk.
I really think people might think about researching the source before they quote or believe what is written in it... or in any publication... for that matter. Thanks Kyleb!