In NMR, Why does longitudinal magnetization decrease when....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), applying energy to a system with static longitudinal net magnetization results in the creation of a transverse component, leading to a decrease in the longitudinal component. This occurs because the RF pulse is specifically designed to flip spins at the appropriate Larmor frequency by 90 degrees, converting longitudinal magnetization into transverse magnetization. The introduction of energy increases the number of antiparallel spins, which further reduces the longitudinal magnetization due to the imbalance between parallel and antiparallel spins.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of NMR principles and terminology
  • Familiarity with RF pulse sequences in MRI
  • Knowledge of Larmor frequency and its significance
  • Basic concepts of spin coherence and magnetization vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mechanics of RF pulse sequences in NMR
  • Explore the concept of spin phase coherence in detail
  • Learn about the effects of energy input on longitudinal and transverse magnetization
  • Investigate advanced NMR techniques such as 180-degree pulse applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in medical imaging, physicists specializing in NMR, and researchers interested in MRI technology and its underlying physics.

OmerKocak
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
*** Answered off site. No need for further explanation. ***


I am trying to understand MR Imaging physics.

In NMR, when you put some energy in a system with a static longitudinal net magnetization, you create a transverse component and the longitudinal component decreases (in other words, net magnetization vector tips sideways). I can not understand why this happens because;

The transverse component is a result of phase coherence. When two individual spins get in phase with each other, why does the longitudinal components suffer. They are the same vectors that now have transverse components in the same direction, which should have to effect on their longitudinal components. And furthermore, to tip that magnetization you put some energy in the system, which should make more spins prefer a higher energy state and thus, should result in a higher longitudinal component.

I do not see anyone addressing this issue, so I guess there is something obvious I am missing but I could not figure out how.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
OmerKocak said:
In NMR, when you put some energy in a system with a static longitudinal net magnetization, you create a transverse component
First of all, it needs to be pointed out that you are not just randomly putting energy into the system. If that was all you did there would just be more spins antiparallel to the longitudinal field without any phase coherence and this would also lead to a lower net longitudinal magnetisation without giving any transverse magnetisation. Instead, the RF pulse is specifically designed to flip spins precessing with the appropriate Larmor frequency 90 degrees. This is also why the longitudinal component decreases, the RF pulse turns it into a transversal component.

OmerKocak said:
And furthermore, to tip that magnetization you put some energy in the system, which should make more spins prefer a higher energy state and thus, should result in a higher longitudinal component.

That more spins prefer higher energy a priori means that the longitudinal magnetisation will decrease, not the other way around, since the previous state has a larger number of parallel than antiparallel spins. Increase the number of antiparallel spins and the longitudinal magnetisation decreases. (You could add even more energy in an ordered way using an RF pulse to turn the magnetisation 180 degrees, bit this will not give you more magnetisation, just the same magnetisation in the opposite direction.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K