1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

In QM operators, why [YPz,YPx]=0, [ZPy,ZPy]=0 [X,Py]=0 [Y,Pz]=0, etc

  1. Nov 14, 2007 #1
    in the quantum mechanical operators :
    why :
    [YPz,YPx]=0
    [ZPy,ZPy]=0
    [X,Py]=0
    [Y,Pz]=0
    [Z,Py]=0
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 14, 2007 #2

    CompuChip

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    For the second:
    What is the commutator of any operator with itself?

    For the last three:
    Can you prove that [X Px] = i h ?
    Now do the same argument for [X Py].

    For the first one:
    Reduce it to Y^2 [Pz Px] using that [Y Pz] = [Y Px] = 0 (which you have just proven) and calculate [Pz Px] in the same way.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2007
  4. Nov 14, 2007 #3
    Isn't [X Px] = i h an axiom, CompuChip?
     
  5. Nov 14, 2007 #4

    OOO

    User Avatar

    Usually one thinks of this as something that nature implements (through de Broglie's relation). If one accepts it as a mathematical axiom a priori then the question "why?" wouldn't make much sense indeed.
     
  6. Nov 14, 2007 #5
    thank
     
  7. Nov 15, 2007 #6

    CompuChip

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hmm, yes it is usually taken as an axiom isn't it.
    But actually the way I first learned it was: the p-operator in x-space can be written as [tex]- i \hbar \partial/\partial x[/tex]
    and from this you can show that (indeed)
    [tex][x p_x] f = - i \hbar x \partial f/\partial x + i \hbar \partial/\partial x (x f) = \cdots = i \hbar f[/tex]
    and it was this reasoning that I wanted muydos to continue to [X Py] (which would then of course give 0).
     
  8. Nov 16, 2007 #7
    [Y,Px] = YPx-PxY
    PxY=
    [tex]P_x Y f(x) = i \hbar \partial /\partial x Y f(x)[/tex]
    [tex]P_x Y f(x) = i \hbar Y \partial f/\partial x + i \hbar \partial Y/\partial x f(x)[/tex]
    YPx=
    [tex]Y P_x f(x) = i \hbar Y \partial f/\partial x [/tex]

    [Y,Px] = YPx-PxY
    [tex]= i \hbar Y \partial f/\partial x - i \hbar Y \partial f/\partial x - i \hbar \partial Y/\partial x f(x) [/tex]

    [Y,Px] = [tex] - i \hbar \partial Y/\partial x f(x) [/tex]
    but
    [Y,Px] = 0

    [tex]- i \hbar \partial Y/\partial x f(x) = ?[/tex] is thes =0 . why?
     
  9. Nov 16, 2007 #8
    why [Y,Px] = 0

    [Y,Px] = YPx-PxY
    PxY=
    [tex]P_x Y f(x) = i \hbar \partial /\partial x Y f(x)[/tex]
    [tex]P_x Y f(x) = i \hbar Y \partial f/\partial x + i \hbar \partial Y/\partial x f(x)[/tex]
    YPx=
    [tex]Y P_x f(x) = i \hbar Y \partial f/\partial x [/tex]

    [Y,Px] = YPx-PxY
    [tex]= i \hbar Y \partial f/\partial x - i \hbar Y \partial f/\partial x - i \hbar \partial Y/\partial x f(x) [/tex]

    [Y,Px] = [tex] - i \hbar \partial Y/\partial x f(x) [/tex]
    but
    [Y,Px] = 0

    [tex]- i \hbar \partial Y/\partial x f(x) = ?[/tex] is thes =0 . why?
     
  10. Nov 16, 2007 #9

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    dY/dx is zero because this "Y" is a position operator for the y coordinate. In other words, one can think of "Y" as a function of only y, and no other variable. Thus, its derivative with respect to other variable, such as x, is zero.

    Zz.
     
  11. Nov 16, 2007 #10
    thak you
     
  12. Nov 16, 2007 #11
    physically..if certain obsevables commute, there exist states for which they all have particular values..(there exist eigenstate of p_x, y, |p_x`>|y`> having their eigenvalues p_x` and y` respectively..) So a mesurement of p_x, y would give only particular value p_x`, y` respectively..
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: In QM operators, why [YPz,YPx]=0, [ZPy,ZPy]=0 [X,Py]=0 [Y,Pz]=0, etc
  1. 0 temperture? (Replies: 2)

Loading...