mudyos
- 10
- 0
in the quantum mechanical operators :
why :
[YPz,YPx]=0
[ZPy,ZPy]=0
[X,Py]=0
[Y,Pz]=0
[Z,Py]=0
why :
[YPz,YPx]=0
[ZPy,ZPy]=0
[X,Py]=0
[Y,Pz]=0
[Z,Py]=0
The discussion revolves around the commutation relations of quantum mechanical operators, specifically examining why certain pairs of operators commute, such as [YPz, YPx] and [X, Py]. Participants explore the implications of these relations and the mathematical reasoning behind them.
Participants express differing views on the foundational nature of certain commutation relations, with some treating them as axiomatic while others seek proofs. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications and interpretations of these relations.
Limitations include assumptions about the operators and their definitions, as well as the mathematical steps involved in proving the commutation relations. Some calculations are left incomplete or unclear, contributing to the ongoing debate.
Can you prove that [X Px] = i h ?
pellman said:Isn't [X Px] = i h an axiom, CompuChip?