In search of a non-linear way to prepare students for this unique exam

AI Thread Summary
The exam for a particular service, based on a Bachelor of Science: Maths syllabus, has been evolving since 1950, aiming to fail a majority of the 1.5 million applicants, with only 1,000 selected each year. Preparing students using a linear approach, such as studying advanced texts like Rudin's and Apostol's, is time-consuming and may not be practical due to the extensive syllabus and the risk of students aging out of eligibility. A non-linear method, focusing on frequently tested topics from the past decade, is suggested but remains unproven in effectiveness. The discussion highlights the absurdity of the exam's low selection rate and emphasizes the importance of genuine motivation for learning, regardless of exam outcomes. The feasibility of covering such a vast syllabus in a short exam duration is also questioned.
Hall
Messages
351
Reaction score
87
Suppose there is an exam of maths, for a particular service, whose syllabus is of Bachelor of Science: Maths level, i.e. the syllabus includes (exhaustively) Linear Algebra, Abstract Algebra, Calculus, Vector Calculus, Real Analysis, Complex Analysis, Ordinary Differential Equations, Partial Differential Equations Analytic Geometry, Numerical Analysis, and some physics topics like Statics and Dynamics, Fluid Mechanics and a little bit of Computer programming.

Now, let us understand the situation; the exam has been being conducted since 1950, so the exam is evolving over time, that is, the moment students and teachers understand the pattern of the exam the exam gets changed! (What I'm trying to say is the exam is conducted yearly, and is a kind of open test. The paper setters are quite unknown, there is a commission of paper setters itself and the commission forms and dissolves in a classified manner. So, every year the paper is very different from the previous years and it is an exam which aims to fail as many students as it can! Out of 1500000 applicants only 1000 get selected.)

How to prepare students for it? Let's start with Real Analysis; first we will teach the student with, say the most common book, Rudin's. To complete everything in the book, and at same time giving the student some time to solve all the exercises assigned, it will surely take 5 months full. Now, the point is: this 5 month long course was a first course for the student and that implies he hasn't mastered the subject but just has become comfortable to it (or at most has attained medium level expertise in it), but the exam will ask the most expertise level question on Real Analysis.

The linear way is to teach the student with Rudin's, then another book of same level say Apostol's Calculus, and then moving to a more advanced text. And after that, just problem solving to develop speed and grasping the mindset of the exam. This linear approach is valid, because first we need to understand the subject very well and only then we can do feats with it, the exercises included in the books are for strengthening the concepts but the questions asked in the exam is to reject you. So, someone following this linear way for all topics listed in syllabus might be able to qualify that exam. But this Linear approach is not that practical; a student might get so tired by moving from introduction to comfortability and finally to expertise ("but that's how everything works!" I know that) for all the different subjects and the more concerning issue is that of time, this linear approach is so time consuming that in life when the student is in its prime youth he finds it very risky to devote such a time (around 2 to 2.5 years and for some even 3.5 years) to that particular exam, his mind will wander (like a ghost) whether he should focus on the studies or over some more job-oriented exams (like those of management studies). It is even possible that a student might cross the age limit for the exam without attaining the expertise in the subjects!

Can you suggest of any non-linear way?

Has USSR went through this? Anyone have any information what was their method? (Why I have asked for USSR specifically? Because it was from there that the trend of competitive exam began: choosing the fastest horse by making all horses take a 2 or 3 hour exam.)

And, I haven't talked about any hypothetical exam in my post, almost all olympiads are like that and many entrance tests of renowned universities are of same type.
 
Science news on Phys.org
One possible non-linear way, which is been followed these days and its efficiency has not been evaluated yet, is to teach students only those topics, or stressing only those topics, on which questions has been asked in the last decade or so.
 
Here's an idea. Don't do this. 1000 of of 1.5 million people is absurdly low. They are looking for people who are mathematically brilliant and have devoted a lot of time to the subject. You're absolutely right that spending two years for the sole purpose of trying to pass this exam is a mistake. Anyone who is attempting to get this job should clearly also feel motivated to learn the material even if they fail, and use that knowledge in a different career in that case.

Also, what exam could possibly take 2-3 hours and cover all of these topics?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Hall
https://www.aapt.org/Conferences/ lists the next set of conferences 2026 Winter Meeting - January 17 - 19, Las Vegas, Nevada 2026 Summer Meeting - July 18 - 22, Pasadena, California 2027 Winter Meeting - January 9 - 12, New Orleans, Louisiana 2027 Summer Meeting - July 31 - August 4, Washington, DC I won't be attending the 2026 Winter Meeting in Las Vegas... For me, it's too close to the start of the semester. https://www.aapt.org/Conferences/wm2026/index.cfm...
Back
Top