MathWarrior said:
This defeats the purpose of a college then. I am willing to bet the only reason they never got fired is because most students are not willing to make legal complaints with the department of education. Gradschool, is entirely different then undergraduate.
Legal complaints?
LEGAL complaints...?
I had a teacher, in a sophomore level course for physics majors tell us, explicitly, on day one:
1. That he had tenure and the only thing that could get him fired was committing a felony.
2. That 90% of his pay came from research obligations and only ten percent amounted to teaching.
3. That anyone interested in signing up for his intramural sports team could do so after class. (admittedly, they were pretty good...)
Now this was a fellow of a large national science society (to be vague). He pulled in an incredible amount of grant money. He had a large group of both grad and undergrad researchers.
He was the worst teacher I ever had.
Nonetheless, I learned much from his class. Why? Because I studied. I read the book. I talked to fellow students. I worked tons of problems.
Looking back, even if he had been a great lecturer, it wouldn't have made much of a difference. I NOW realize that most of my learning comes from outside the class. Pretty lectures are icing on the cake, but fairly useless in the long run.
But his tests were really easy, so if you got a 100% on the homework you did well on the exams. I guess perhaps you might have liked him.
I always found that knowing a professors exams are miserably difficult made me overstudy. THAT's how I learn. The fear that the professor's exam is NOTHING like the homework. Knowing you have to search every book, every crevasse for an extra problem to work on. Scrape for every last drop of understanding.