Incompleteness of Euclidean Geometry: Proving the Parallel Postulate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the incompleteness of Euclidean geometry, specifically regarding the parallel postulate, which states that if a line segment intersects two lines with angles less than 90 degrees, those lines must intersect. It is established that the parallel postulate cannot be proven or disproven using Euclid's remaining axioms, as demonstrated by the existence of non-Euclidean geometries, such as hyperbolic geometry, where the postulate does not hold. The conversation highlights that while stronger postulates could allow for the proof of the parallel postulate, it remains unprovable within the confines of Euclidean axioms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euclidean geometry and its axioms
  • Familiarity with the concept of the parallel postulate
  • Knowledge of non-Euclidean geometries, particularly hyperbolic geometry
  • Basic comprehension of Gödel's incompleteness theorems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Gödel's incompleteness theorems on mathematical systems
  • Explore hyperbolic geometry and its properties compared to Euclidean geometry
  • Study alternative axiomatic systems that include the parallel postulate
  • Investigate the historical context and development of the parallel postulate in mathematical literature
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, educators, and students seeking a deeper understanding of the foundations of geometry and the implications of axiomatic systems.

junglebeast
Messages
514
Reaction score
2
"For example, Euclidean geometry without the parallel postulate is incomplete; it is not possible to prove or disprove the parallel postulate from the remaining axioms."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel's_incompleteness_theorems

The parallel postulate says that, if a line segment intersects 2 lines that both have angles less than 90 degrees, then those two lines must intersect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_postulate

Why is it be impossible to prove this postulate? This seems intuitively obvious and seems like it would be very easy to prove on the basis of simply calculating the intersection point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
junglebeast said:
"For example, Euclidean geometry without the parallel postulate is incomplete; it is not possible to prove or disprove the parallel postulate from the remaining axioms."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel's_incompleteness_theorems

The parallel postulate says that, if a line segment intersects 2 lines that both have angles less than 90 degrees, then those two lines must intersect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_postulate

Why is it be impossible to prove this postulate? This seems intuitively obvious and seems like it would be very easy to prove on the basis of simply calculating the intersection point.

What axioms are you going to use to prove it? What assumptions do you make in your calculation?

There are quite a number of axioms which are equivalent to the parallel postulate, in the sense that they can be proved from the postulate, and which allow you to prove the postulate.

There are also geometries which satisfy all the other axioms of Euclid, and in which the parallel postulate is not true. For example... a hyperboloid geometry. This shows it must be impossible to prove the postulate from the other axioms.

Cheers -- sylas
 
junglebeast said:
Why is it be impossible to prove this postulate?

It's not.

It's impossible to prove it from Euclid's postulates. Stronger postulates could allow it to be proven. Examples:
* Trivially: Euclid's axioms + the parallel postulate
* Less trivial: Euclid's axioms + "a rectangle exists"

One nice way to think of it is that hyperbolic geometry is a model of Euclid's axioms where the parallel postulate fails.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K