Inconsistencies in classical physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the inconsistencies in classical physics, particularly in relation to the black body problem and the conservation of energy. Participants explore how classical electromagnetic theory predicts infinite energy radiation from black body radiators and the implications of this prediction for classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how classical electromagnetic theory predicts infinite energy radiation from a black body radiator despite the conservation of energy principle associated with conservative forces.
  • Another participant suggests that the concept of infinite power is more of an expectation rather than a derived value, noting that it would not apply to finite objects composed of a limited number of atoms.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that classical theory is flawed in microscopic situations, leading to the development of quantum theories to address these issues.
  • One participant identifies a flaw in classical electromagnetic wave theory, stating that energy is absorbed or emitted continuously, which leads to infinite emitted power as frequency increases, contradicting conservation of energy expectations.
  • To address the identified flaw, it is proposed that energy is absorbed or emitted in discrete packets (photons), while still traveling as classical electromagnetic waves, which introduces additional complexities.
  • It is mentioned that Quantum ElectroDynamics (QED) incorporates classical electromagnetic wave theory as a low-frequency limit, suggesting a connection between classical and quantum descriptions of electromagnetic phenomena.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of classical physics in the context of black body radiation and conservation of energy. There is no consensus on the resolution of these inconsistencies, and multiple competing perspectives are presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in classical electromagnetic theory and the assumptions underlying the predictions of energy radiation. It also reflects on the transition to quantum theories without resolving the specific mathematical or conceptual challenges presented.

jackferry
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
A question I've had about the black body problem and classical physics in general has to do with the conservation of energy.

One of the first things you can derive in classical mechanics is that for a conservative force the total energy of the system doesn't change. However, one of the typical examples of the failure of classical mechanics is the prediction of infinite energy radiated by a black body radiator. My question is how the classical EM theory predicts the radiation of infinite energy when the EM force is conservative. Is there some assumption that allows for the breaking of the conservation of energy in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The infinite power is more like an expectation than a derived value, and it wouldn't occur with a finite object made up out of a finite number of atoms.

On the other hand, atoms don't work in classical mechanics anyway - the electrons would fall into the nucleus.
 
jackferry said:
A question I've had about the black body problem and classical physics in general has to do with the conservation of energy.

One of the first things you can derive in classical mechanics is that for a conservative force the total energy of the system doesn't change. However, one of the typical examples of the failure of classical mechanics is the prediction of infinite energy radiated by a black body radiator. My question is how the classical EM theory predicts the radiation of infinite energy when the EM force is conservative. Is there some assumption that allows for the breaking of the conservation of energy in this case?
Classical theory is flawed. It does not work in microscopic situations or many situation for that matter. To avoid such a "breaking" of the conservation of energy, quantum physicists created the appropriate theories to tackle the problems. Quantum physics was their solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and Delta2
The flaw in the classical EM wave theory is that EM energy is absorbed (or emitted) in a continuous way. This flaw might be hidden when studying other problems regarding EM waves but it shows up in the case of the black body radiation as that emitted power goes to infinity as frequency goes to infinity (while we would expect by typical reasoning and for the main reason of conservation energy that as frequency tends to infinity the emitted power would go to zero).

To correct this flaw, scientists initially suggested that EM energy is absorbed or emitted in discrete packets (photons) but travels as classical EM wave. This leads to some other difficulties as well, in order to fix all the difficulties a new theory emerged , Quantum ElectroDynamics. QED has as "a low frequency limit " the classical EM wave theory because at relatively low frequencies f the energy of the discrete energy packet (photon) is low ##E=hf## where h is plank's constant which is pretty small number, so the energy is absorbed or emitted in very small packets ##hf## could say infinitesimal packets , so it is like it happens in a continuous way, like the classical EM wave theory suggest..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K