Increase magnetic field density near surface of magnet

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to increase the magnetic field density near the surface of magnets, specifically in the context of levitating diamagnetic pyrolytic graphite. Participants explore various configurations and materials that could enhance magnetic levitation, including the use of high-permeability metal sheets and alternative magnet arrangements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that placing a magnet track on a high-permeability metal sheet could intensify the magnetic field strength in the area where the graphite levitates, potentially improving levitation and payload capacity.
  • Another participant counters that using a high-permeability sheet may not strengthen the field and could even weaken it slightly, especially in an open region rather than a confined gap.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the effects of the sheet on the magnetic field and asks if it would increase field density above the magnet, referencing a visual representation of magnetic fields.
  • One participant shares simulation results indicating that a high-permeability sheet could lead to a 25% increase in magnetic field strength, although they note that the thickness of the sheet is also a significant factor.
  • Another participant acknowledges the simulation results and expresses satisfaction that their initial prediction about the effect of the sheet was correct.
  • One participant explains that using a steel sheet effectively concentrates magnetic energy in a smaller space, resulting in a higher field level on the magnet side of the sheet.
  • A suggestion is made to use a U-shaped steel bar to further concentrate the magnetic field lines, which could stabilize the levitation trajectory of the graphite.
  • Another participant proposes using a nullflux coil above or below the graphite to potentially enhance the magnetic field, indicating a need for finite element analysis (FEA) to optimize the design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of high-permeability sheets in enhancing magnetic field density. While some support the idea that such sheets can improve field strength, others argue that they may not provide the desired effect, leading to an unresolved discussion on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the limitations of their assumptions regarding the configurations and materials used, as well as the dependence on specific conditions such as the thickness of the metal sheet and the arrangement of magnets.

Waterfox
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I'm currently playing with diamagnetic pyrolytic graphite and I have created a small portion of a track similar to this video
I want to create a circular track for it travel on, but as rare Earth magnets are getting expensive I'm going to use thinner magnets that consequently have a weaker magnetic field.

I still want to have a small cosmetic payload so I'm asking how can I maximise the magnetic field density where it levitates about 1-3mm above the magnets' surface?
I know objects with high permeability can shape magnetic fields, so if I place the magnet track on a sheet of metal with high permeability, will it intensify the field strength in the area the graphite levitates, supporting better levitation and a better payload?
If so, looking at this list on wikipedia, will higher permeability work better? e.g using Mu-metal would be better than electrical steel which would be better than normal steel?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Waterfox said:
..so if I place the magnet track on a sheet of metal with high permeability, will it intensify the field strength in the area the graphite levitates, supporting better levitation and a better payload?

No, this way it doesn't strengthen the field. It even weakens it slightly. I you need a stronger field in a narrow air gap ( or inside the a ferromagnetic metal), high-permeability can help, but I guess you need it in an open region ( not a gap). Magnetic energy of the the magnet is constant. I don't think you can increase the field in the air without limiting the air region to a smaller volume.
 
I'm not entirely sure how the sheet will affect the field but I expected something like this:
http://img805.imageshack.us/img805/3425/magneticfield.jpg

Is this what will happen? To simplify things, will this increase the field density in the small volume above the magnet like in the picture? If I placed a magnetometer 1mm above the magnet's surface will I get a higher reading with the sheet of high permeability metal?
If not how can a concentrate the field so its closer to the surface of the magnet and not so spread out?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes such a configuration, it strengthen the field to some extent. Sorry, I misread you previous post as placing the metal sheet on the magnet and gave you the wrong answer.

I did a simulation of this problem with my finite element software. The simulation is not exact but the results shows the effect of the sheet to some extent. I replaced the magnet with a coil because my software doesn't support permanent magnet. It shows about 25% increase in the field ( for the relative thickness of sheet to magnet shown in the picture) . The image of the field distributions with and without the metal sheet is attached. The arrow size is proportional to the field magnitude at the corresponding point.

The sheet is iron here. A higher permeability would give have a better but i think the difference would little. The thickness of the sheet is important too but above a certain thickness ( depending on the the magnet's height) the different is negligible.http://www.uploadup.com/di-2O73.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for going to effort of running a simulation, it seems my prediction was true despite my limited knowledge of magnetism. Also a 25% increase will actually make the thinner magnets slightly more effective than the thicker ones for my use, so given imperfections it should be about equivalent which is what I was hoping for.
Thanks for helping!
 
Yes you were right and you have a good common sense to predict this. I am looking forward to seeing the measurement result. Please share it with us once done.
 
With the steel sheet, you're essentially removing the magentic energy from the space on the other side of that sheet, so the space on the magnet side of the sheet is then filled with higher field level. The total magnetic energy in the space around the magnet is [much] the same, but it now occupies a smaller space, thus higher field.
 
You could also try to insert your magnets into a U-shaped steel bar, especially if the fit is rather tight. This will give the same effect as in your sketch, but the field lines would be bundled even closer to the edge of the magnet.

If the U is a bit higher than the magnet, you should get higher field at the edges than in the center. This would stabilize the trajectory of the surfer. Obviously, the U has to be wider than the board.
 
Off of left wall here. Look up nullflux 8 coil and fasion a coil above or underneath your graphite sheet/board. Start with a single layer or if Hassan2 would FEA it you may be able to find the correct wind. I could use FEA results write about now. Anyways it may work for you. Good luck.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K