Increasing or decreasing - logarithms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the behavior of the function y=ln(1/x) without using calculators or graphing tools. Participants clarify that y=ln(1/x) can be rewritten as y=-ln(x), indicating that the function is strictly decreasing since the logarithm of x is increasing for x>0. The derivative of ln(1/x) is -1/x, which is negative for all x>0, confirming the function's decreasing nature. The conversation also touches on the importance of understanding inverse functions in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions, specifically ln(x)
  • Basic knowledge of function behavior and monotonicity
  • Familiarity with inverse functions and their properties
  • Concept of derivatives and their implications on function growth
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of logarithmic functions and their graphs
  • Learn about the relationship between a function and its inverse
  • Explore the concept of derivatives and their role in determining function behavior
  • Investigate the applications of logarithmic functions in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students in one-dimensional analysis, educators teaching calculus concepts, and anyone interested in understanding logarithmic functions and their properties.

Rectifier
Gold Member
Messages
313
Reaction score
4
Hey there!
How do I determine whether this function is growing or decreasing without using any calculator or graphing tools?
y=ln(\frac{1}{x})
I know that
y=ln(\frac{1}{x}) \ \Leftrightarrow \ e^y=\frac{1}{x} \ \ \ (1)
Then I tried to use the formula
f(x)=a^x and then determine whether a is 0<a<1 or a>1. But I don't know how I should do to write (1) in the same same manner :( .

If a is 0<a<1 means that the function is strictly decreasing.
If a is a>1 means that the function is strictly increasing.

Could someone please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rectifier said:
Hey there!
How do I determine whether this function is growing or decreasing without using any calculator or graphing tools?
y=ln(\frac{1}{x})
I know that
y=ln(\frac{1}{x}) \ \Leftrightarrow \ e^y=\frac{1}{x} \ \ \ (1)
Then I tried to use the formula
f(x)=a^x and then determine whether a is 0<a<1 or a>1. But I don't know how I should do to write (1) in the same same manner :( .

If a is 0<a<1 means that the function is strictly decreasing.
If a is a>1 means that the function is strictly increasing.

Could someone please help me?

Your function doesn't have that form. Is this a calculus class? Can't you just take the derivative?
 
Dick said:
Your function doesn't have that form. Is this a calculus class? Can't you just take the derivative?

I don't know if its calculus or not. Its called one-dimensional analysis and its a class I take where I live - in Sweden.

There should be another way to do that than the derivative since I must be able to plot the function after that without a calculator or a graphing tool.

I am sorry if this is the wrong subforum.
 
Rectifier said:
I don't know if its calculus or not. Its called one-dimensional analysis and its a class I take where I live - in Sweden.

There should be another way to do that than the derivative since I must be able to plot the function after that without a calculator or a graphing tool.

I am sorry if this is the wrong subforum.

I think the forum is ok. If you have 1/x=e^y then you have x=e^(-y)=(1/e)^y. That will let you plot x=f(y) as a decreasing function of y since (1/e)<1. What does your graph translate to when you think of y as a function of x?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Rectifier said:
I don't know if its calculus or not. Its called one-dimensional analysis and its a class I take where I live - in Sweden.

There should be another way to do that than the derivative since I must be able to plot the function after that without a calculator or a graphing tool.

I am sorry if this is the wrong subforum.
Yes, "analysis" is "Calculus". (In the United States we tend to use the word "Analysis" to mean "the theory behind Calculus" so a higher level course than "Calculus".)

Why would not using a calculator or graphing tool mean you cannot take the derivative?

The derivative of ln(1/x)= - ln(x) is -1/x. You can tell where that is positive or negative without a calculator, can't you?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you for your comment!

You went through f(y) to determine whether the function is decreasing or increasing in terms of x being a funtion of y to then mirror the function on the x=y line and get the inverse which is the original function. But the nice thing here is that since the inverse is increasing this must mean that the original is increasing too.

Did I get it right?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, "analysis" is "Calculus". (In the United States we tend to use the word "Analysis" to mean "the theory behind Calculus" so a higher level course than "Calculus".)

Why would not using a calculator or graphing tool mean you cannot take the derivative?

The derivative of ln(1/x)= - ln(x) is -1/x. You can tell where that is positive or negative without a calculator, can't you?

Yeah I can :) but oficially I am not allowed to use derivatives since I am not at that chapter of the book :D.

I like to have more than one way to the solution. Thank you for your comment HallsofIvy :)
 
Rectifier said:
Hey there!
How do I determine whether this function is growing or decreasing without using any calculator or graphing tools?
y=ln(\frac{1}{x})
I know that
y=ln(\frac{1}{x}) \ \Leftrightarrow \ e^y=\frac{1}{x} \ \ \ (1)
Then I tried to use the formula
f(x)=a^x and then determine whether a is 0<a<1 or a>1. But I don't know how I should do to write (1) in the same same manner :( .

If a is 0<a<1 means that the function is strictly decreasing.
If a is a>1 means that the function is strictly increasing.

Could someone please help me?

y = \ln \left( \frac{1}{x}\right) = - \ln(x)
Do you know what the graph of ##\ln(x)## looks like?

BTW: in LaTeX you should write "\ln" instead of "ln", because it produces better-looking results: compare ##ln(x)##, entered as # # ln(x) # # (no spaces) with ##\ln(x)##, entered as # #\ln(x) # # (no spaces).
 
Last edited:
Rectifier said:
Thank you for your comment!

You went through f(y) to determine whether the function is decreasing or increasing in terms of x being a funtion of y to then mirror the function on the x=y line and get the inverse which is the original function. But the nice thing here is that since the inverse is increasing this must mean that the original is increasing too.

Did I get it right?

Right idea, but x=(1/e)^y isn't increasing. I hope that was a typo.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
Dick said:
Right idea, but x=(1/e)^y isn't increasing. I hope that was a typo.

Hehe indeed I was going to write decreasing. Thank you for your help :)
 
  • #11
Ray Vickson said:
y = \ln \left( \frac{1}{x}\right) = - \ln(x)
Do you know what the graph of ##\ln(x)## looks like?
Oh, I didnt see that option! Thank you for pointing this out!


Ray Vickson said:
BTW: in LaTeX you should write "\ln" instead of "ln", because it produces better-looking results: compare ##ln(x)##, entered as # # ln(x) # # (no spaces) with ##\ln(x)##, entered as # #\ln(x) # # (no spaces).
Thank you yet again :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K