Ind the distance traveled by the ball

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter corpuzdawn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Distance traveled
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance traveled by a ceramic ball that falls and bounces on a surface, specifically focusing on the effects of the coefficient of restitution on the ball's motion. Participants explore the implications of the coefficient of restitution being halved after each bounce and its relationship to kinetic and potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the distance traveled by the ball is zero due to it bouncing at one spot.
  • Others clarify that the distance traveled refers to the vertical distance and not displacement.
  • There is a discussion about the coefficient of restitution and its effect on the height of the ball after each bounce, with some suggesting that it results in the height being halved.
  • Some participants propose that if the coefficient of restitution is 0.5, then the velocity and kinetic energy are halved, leading to a potential height reduction.
  • One participant suggests that if the kinetic energy is halved, the height reached after the bounce would be quartered.
  • There is confusion regarding the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy, with participants discussing the formula for kinetic energy and its conservation during the ball's motion.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the interpretation of the coefficient of restitution and whether it changes with each bounce.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the coefficient of restitution and its implications for the ball's motion. There is no consensus on the exact distance traveled or the correct interpretation of energy relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem may have been misinterpreted regarding the coefficient of restitution and its effects on speed and height. There is also ambiguity in the definitions of distance versus displacement.

corpuzdawn
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A ceramic ball of mass m falls form rest a distance h[0] above a horizontal ceramic surface. The subsequent motion of the ball is purely vertical, bouncing ONLY on one spot on the surface. If the coefficient of restitution between the ball and surface halves after every bounce, find the distance traveled by the ball when the ball hits the surface for the third time.


is the distance traveled 0? because the ball only bounces at one spot?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
corpuzdawn said:
is the distance traveled 0? because the ball only bounces at one spot?

NO, they want you to find the vertical distance traveled by the ball.
 
corpuzdawn said:
If the coefficient of restitution between the ball and surface halves after every bounce.
My guess is this should be "the coefficient of restitution results in the height of the ball being halved after every bounce". The coeffiecient is constant, but the height of the ball is halved on each bounce. If the coefficient is halved, then you'd need to know the initial coefficient of restitution on the first bounce.
 
rcgldr said:
My guess is this should be "the coefficient of restitution results in the height of the ball being halved after every bounce". The coeffiecient is constant, but the height of the ball is halved on each bounce. If the coefficient is halved, then you'd need to know the initial coefficient of restitution on the first bounce.

Take care here.
If the coefficient of restitution is 0.5 then the velocity will be halved. What does that say about the Kinetic Energy remaining and what does that say about the Height of the subsequent bounce?
 
sophiecentaur said:
Take care here.
If the coefficient of restitution is 0.5 then the velocity will be halved. What does that say about the Kinetic Energy remaining and what does that say about the Height of the subsequent bounce?

if the velocity is halved.. the KE is also halved... which means... the height is quartered?
 
What is the formula for ke?
 
oops. sorry. KE= [1/2]mv^2 so... the KE is quartered?
 
That's better. So height is a quarter, too. Mgh = KE
 
so that's the answer? the distance traveled is... h[0]/4
 
  • #10
Yep.
That 50% gives an over-optimistic view of what's really going on. In fact, 3/4 of the original energy's lost.
 
  • #11
rcgldr said:
My guess is this should be "the coefficient of restitution results in the height of the ball being halved after every bounce". The coeffiecient is constant, but the height of the ball is halved on each bounce. If the coefficient is halved, then you'd need to know the initial coefficient of restitution on the first bounce.

sophiecentaur said:
If the coefficient of restitution is 0.5 then the velocity will be halved. What does that say about the Kinetic Energy remaining and what does that say about the Height of the subsequent bounce?
Sorry for my somwhat confusing response, Cr (coefficient of restitution) = ratio of (speed after bounce) / (speed before bounce) or sqrt( (height after bounce) / (height before bounce) ).

The issue I was trying to point out is tha the OP states that Cr is halved on each bounce, versus stating that the speed or the height was being halved on each bounce. My guess is that the original problem meant that the speed (Cr = .5) or the height (Cr = sqrt(.5) ~= .7071) was halved on each bounce, not the Cr itself.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Absolutely. The COR can hardly change on each bounce.
 
  • #13
sophiecentaur said:
That's better. So height is a quarter, too. Mgh = KE

why is KE=mgh? is it PE=mgh?
 
  • #14
mass X g X height ? Not familiar?

btw, if they had wanted the aswer for "distance traveled" to be zero, they would probably have said "displacement" which is a vector quantity. Distance is a scalar.
 
  • #15
sorry... but I always thought that mgh is PE. why is KE=mgh again?
 
  • #16
Oh I see what you mean. The KE becomes mgh (at the top) was what I meant. (conservation)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K