Can the Chain Rule Be Applied in Reverse for Integrating Functions Like u^n?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the chain rule in reverse for integrating functions of the form \( u^n \), where \( u \) is a function of \( x \) and \( n \) is a positive rational number. It is established that while the derivative \( \frac{d}{dx} u^n \) can be computed using the chain rule, there is no general method for integrating \( \int u^n \, dx \) for arbitrary \( u(x) \). The reverse of the chain rule is effectively integration by substitution, which requires that \( \frac{du}{dx} \) be present in the integral. An exception occurs when \( u \) is linear, allowing for a straightforward integration formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the chain rule in calculus
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, particularly integration by substitution
  • Knowledge of elementary functions and their antiderivatives
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integration by substitution in detail
  • Explore the properties of antiderivatives for various types of functions
  • Learn about special cases of integration involving linear functions
  • Investigate advanced integration techniques, such as integration by parts
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of integration techniques and the relationship between differentiation and integration.

Izzhov
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
There is a simple formula for calculating \frac{df(x)}{dx} u^n where u is a function of x and n is a positive rational number: \frac{df(x)}{dx} u^n = nu^{n-1} \ast \frac{du}{dx}. Is there a similar formula for calculating \int u^n dx where u is a function of x and n is a positive rational number? It would be extremely helpful if there was.

P.S. I realize that the formula for \frac{df(x)}{dx} u^n can be derived using the chain rule, so I was wondering if maybe the chain rule can somehow be applied in reverse for this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Izzhov said:
There is a simple formula for calculating \frac{df(x)}{dx} u^n where u is a function of x and n is a positive rational number: \frac{df(x)}{dx} u^n = nu^{n-1} \ast \frac{du}{dx}. Is there a similar formula for calculating \int u^n dx where u is a function of x and n is a positive rational number? It would be extremely helpful if there was.

P.S. I realize that the formula for \frac{df(x)}{dx} u^n can be derived using the chain rule, so I was wondering if maybe the chain rule can somehow be applied in reverse for this problem?

Actually that "f(x)" should not be there. In the Leibniz notation the differentiation operator is simply \frac{d}{dx}.

As for the question itself, there's no general method for computing \int u^{n}(x) {} dx for arbitrary "u(x)". In most cases, one can't find the antiderivative in terms of elemetary functions, even though "u(x)" may be elementary.
 
The "reverse" of the chain rule is basically integration by substitution. The problem is that when differentiating, using the chain rule, we are free to multiply by du/dx no matter what it is. When integrating, using substitution, that du/dx must already be in the integral- unless it is a constant, we can't just "put it in".

\int u^n \frac{du}{dx}dx= \int u^n du= \frac{1}{n+1}u^{n+1}
But that "du/dx" must already be in the integral.

The one exception to that is, as I said, when du/dx is a constant- when u is linear.
\int (ax+b)^n dx= \frac{1}{a(n+1)}(ax+b)^{n+1}
By letting u= ax+ b so that du= a dx and dx= (1/a)du.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
485
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K